Environmental policy, the porter hypothesis and the composition of capital: Effects of learning and technological progress

被引:62
作者
Feichtinger, G
Hartl, RF
Kort, PM
Veliov, VM
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Dept Econometr, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, Ctr Operat Res, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Vienna Univ Technol, Inst Math Methods Econ, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
[4] Univ Vienna, Inst Management, A-1210 Vienna, Austria
[5] Univ Antwerp, Dept Econ, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[6] Bulgarian Acad Sci, Inst Math & Informat, Sofia, Bulgaria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Porter hypothesis; dynamics of the firm; vintage capital stock; environmental policy; technological progress;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeem.2004.12.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper the effect of environmental policy on the composition of capital is investigated. By allowing for nonlinearities it generalizes Xepapadeas and De Zeeuw (J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 37 (1999) 165) and determines scenarios in which their results do not carry over. In particular, we show that the way acquisition cost of investment decreases with the age of the capital stock is of crucial importance. We also focus more explicitly on learning and technological progress. Among others we obtain that in the presence of learning, implementing a stricter environmental policy with the aim to reach a certain target of emissions reduction has a stronger negative effect on industry profits, which implies quite the opposite as to what is described by the Porter hypothesis. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 446
页数:13
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]  
Carlson DA, 1991, INFINITE HORIZON OPT
[2]   Optimality conditions for age-structured control systems [J].
Feichtinger, G ;
Tragler, G ;
Veliov, VM .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, 2003, 288 (01) :47-68
[3]  
FEICHTINGER G, INPRESS EUROP J OPER
[4]  
FEICHTINGER G, IN PRESS J EC THEORY
[5]   Environmental policy and competitiveness: The Porter hypothesis and the composition of capital [J].
Xepapadeas, A ;
de Zeeuw, A .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1999, 37 (02) :165-182