Stereoselective interaction of ketamine with recombinant μ, κ, and δ opioid receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells

被引:99
作者
Hirota, K
Okawa, H
Appadu, BL
Grandy, DK
Devi, LA
Lambert, DG [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirm, Dept Anaesthesia, Leicester LE1 5WW, Leics, England
[2] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Physiol Pharmacol, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] NYU Med Ctr, Dept Pharmacol, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
adenylyl cyclase; opioid receptor antagonist; radioligand binding; radioreceptor assay;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199901000-00023
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background The authors examined the interaction of ketamine with recombinant mu, kappa, and delta opioid receptors and recombinant orphan opioid receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-mu, CHO-kappa, CHO-delta, and CHOORL1, respectively). Methods: CHO-mu, CHO-kappa, and CHO-delta membranes were incubated with the opioid receptor radioligand [H-3]diprenorphine at room temperature. Ketamine (racemic, R(-) and S(+)) was included at concentrations covering the clinical range. CHOORL1 membranes were incubated with [I-125]Tyr(14) nociceptin and racemic ketamine at room temperature. The effects of racemic ketamine and selective opioid receptor agonists (mu: [D-Ala(2), MePhe(4), Gly(ol)(5)] enkephalin (DAMGO); kappa: spiradoline or delta: [D-pen(2), D-pen(5)] enkephalin (DPDPE)) on forskolin-stimulated cyclic adenosine monophosphate formation also were examined. Data are mean + SEM. Results: Racemic ketamine increased the radioligand equilibrium dissociation constant for [H-3]diprenorphine from 85 +/- 5 to 273 +/- 11, 91 +/- 6 to 154 +/- 16, and 372 +/- 15 to 855 +/- 42 pM in CHO-mu, CHO-kappa, and CHO-delta, respectively. The concentration of radioligand bound at saturation was unaffected. In CHO-mu and CHO-kappa cells, racemic ketamine did not slow the rate of naloxone-induced [H-3]diprenorphine dissociation. Ketamine and its isomers also displaced [H-3]diprenorphine binding to mu, kappa, and delta receptors in a dose-dependent manner, with pK(i) values for racemic ketamine of 4.38 +/- 0.02, 4.55 +/- 0.04, and 3.57 +/- 0.02, respectively. SCC) -ketamine was two to three times more potent than R(-)-ketamine at mu and kappa receptors, Racemic ketamine displaced [I-125]Tyr(14)nociceptin with an estimated affinity constant of 0.5 mM. Racemic ketamine inhibited the formation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (naloxone insensitive) in a dose-dependent manner (concentration producing 50% inhibition similar to 2 mM) in all cell Lines, including untransfected CHO cells. Ketamine (100 mu M) reversed DAMGO (mu) and spiradoline (kappa) inhibition of formation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate. Conclusions: Ketamine interacts stereoselectively with recombinant mu and kappa opioid receptors.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 182
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Interaction of [H-3]orphanin FQ and I-125-Tyr14-orphanin FQ with the orphanin FQ receptor: Kinetics and modulation by cations and guanine nucleotides [J].
Ardati, A ;
Henningsen, RA ;
Higelin, J ;
Reinscheid, RK ;
Civelli, O ;
Monsma, FJ .
MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 51 (05) :816-824
[2]   OPIOID RECEPTOR DENSITY CHANGES IN ALZHEIMER AMYGDALA AND PUTAMEN [J].
BARG, J ;
BELCHEVA, M ;
ROWINSKI, J ;
HO, A ;
BURKE, WJ ;
CHUNG, HD ;
SCHMIDT, CA ;
COSCIA, CJ .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1993, 632 (1-2) :209-215
[3]   EVIDENCE FOR A SUPRASPINAL MECHANISM IN THE OPIOID-MEDIATED ANTINOCICEPTIVE EFFECT OF KETAMINE [J].
BAUMEISTER, A ;
ADVOKAT, C .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1991, 566 (1-2) :351-353
[4]   SIMPLE AND SENSITIVE SATURATION ASSAY METHOD FOR MEASUREMENT OF ADENOSINE 3'-5'-CYCLIC MONOPHOSPHATE [J].
BROWN, BL ;
ALBANO, JDM ;
EKINS, RP ;
SGHERZI, AM ;
TAMPION, W .
BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1971, 121 (03) :561-+
[5]  
BUNZOW JR, 1995, J NEUROCHEM, V64, P14
[6]  
CHENG Y, 1973, BIOCHEM PHARMACOL, V22, P3099
[7]  
Cvejic S, 1996, J BIOL CHEM, V271, P4073
[8]  
Dhawan BN, 1996, PHARMACOL REV, V48, P567
[9]  
DOMINO EF, 1982, ANESTH ANALG, V61, P87
[10]   OPIATE RECEPTOR MEDIATION OF KETAMINE ANALGESIA [J].
FINCK, AD ;
NGAI, SH .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1982, 56 (04) :291-297