An economic analysis of the receiver pays principle

被引:21
作者
Kim, JY
Lim, Y
机构
[1] Dongguk Univ, Dept Econ, Chung Ku, Seoul 100715, South Korea
[2] Dongguk Womens Univ, Dept Econ, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
caller pays principle; receiver pays principle; interconnection charge;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-6245(01)00036-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the effect of the receiver pays principle (RPP) on the calling price, social welfare and interconnection charge. A significant difficulty with introducing this system in telecommunications pricing is the possibility that the receiving party may refuse to receive a call if the charge he has to bear is very high. We find the condition under which no calls are refused and show that the profit maximizing prices charged to the calling party and the receiving party must satisfy this condition. We demonstrate that the calling price under RPP must be lower than the price under the caller pays principle (CPP), that the profit of;l firm will be increased under RPP, but that the consumer surplus will not necessarily be inc::eased under RPP despite the lowered calling price. Also, we show that, if the demand function is linear, the reciprocal interconnection charge under RPP is higher than that under CPP. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 260
页数:30
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
ACTON J, 1990, R3715NSFMF RAND CORP
[2]   Network interconnection in telecommunications [J].
Armstrong, M .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1998, 108 (448) :545-564
[3]   THE PROBLEM OF SOCIAL COST [J].
COASE, RH .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1960, 3 (OCT) :1-44
[4]  
Doyle C., 1998, Information Economics and Policy, V10, P471, DOI 10.1016/S0167-6245(98)00015-8
[5]  
ECONOMIDES N, 1998, UNPUB STRATEGIC COMM
[6]  
GARIS J, 2000, IN PRESS EC LETT
[7]  
GARIS J, 2000, INFORMATION EC POLIC, V12, P301
[8]  
JOSEPH K, 1996, OVUM REPORT PCS MASS
[9]  
LADBROOK B, 1999, OVUM REPORT ANN COUN
[10]   Network competition: I. Overview and nondiscriminatory pricing [J].
Laffont, JJ ;
Rey, P ;
Tirole, J .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 29 (01) :1-37