Embedded premium promotion: Why it works and how to make it more effective

被引:160
作者
Arora, Neeraj
Henderson, Ty
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Red McCombs Sch Business, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
embedded premium; sales promotion; consumer choice; hierarchical Bayes; ROI; cause-related; marketing;
D O I
10.1287/mksc.1060.0247
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper we define an embedded premium (EP) as an enhancement that involves a social cause added on to a product or service. We characterize EP as a sales promotion strategy and juxtapose it with traditional approaches, such as discounts and rebates. Across three experiments, using a nationwide Internet panel and employing stated measures and model-based inference, we find that at low denominations EP is more effective than an equivalent price discount. We describe how an EP's social association may influence consumer choice quite differently than price promotions and, contrary to the asymmetric price promotion effect documented in the promotions literature, we find that EP benefits an unknown brand more than a known brand. Our hierarchical Bayes approach uncovers heterogeneity in EP effectiveness that can be explained by affinity toward the focal charity, personal motivations, and demographic markers. An identifiable segment of individuals prefer the "other" over "self," suggesting possible EP optimization and segmentation strategies. Two such strategies, custornization and coverage, are empirically tested, and the former is shown to be very effective. Our findings have broad implications for brand managers with regard to resource allocation and EP program return on investment (ROI), as well as important social welfare implications.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 531
页数:18
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Predicting competitive response to a major policy change: Combining game-theoretic and empirical analyses [J].
Ailawadi, KL ;
Kopalle, PK ;
Neslin, SA .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2005, 24 (01) :12-24
[2]   On the heterogeneity of demand [J].
Allenby, GM ;
Arora, N ;
Ginter, JL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1998, 35 (03) :384-389
[3]   USING EXTREMES TO DESIGN PRODUCTS AND SEGMENT MARKETS [J].
ALLENBY, GM ;
GINTER, JL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1995, 32 (04) :392-403
[4]  
ANDREONI J, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P891
[5]   Giving according to garp: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism [J].
Andreoni, J ;
Miller, J .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (02) :737-753
[6]   IMPURE ALTRUISM AND DONATIONS TO PUBLIC-GOODS - A THEORY OF WARM-GLOW GIVING [J].
ANDREONI, J .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1990, 100 (401) :464-477
[7]  
[Anonymous], FRONTIERS ECONOMETRI
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1966, THEORY MORAL SENTIME
[9]   A hierarchical Bayes model of primary and secondary demand [J].
Arora, N ;
Allenby, GM ;
Ginter, JL .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1998, 17 (01) :29-44
[10]   Measuring the influence of individual preference structures in group decision making [J].
Arora, N ;
Allenby, GM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1999, 36 (04) :476-487