Stages of Supply Chain Disruption Response: Direct, Constraining, and Mediating Factors for Impact Mitigation

被引:132
作者
Bode, Christoph [1 ]
Macdonald, John R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mannheim, Sch Business, D-68131 Mannheim, Germany
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Management, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
Decision response stages; Disruption management; Supply chain; Supply chain risk; RISK-MANAGEMENT; MODEL; CRISIS; CONSEQUENCES; ANTECEDENTS; COMPLEXITY; EVENTS; DESIGN; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1111/deci.12245
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
It is well established that supply chain disruptions can have a severe negative impact on firms and general wisdom suggests that this impact can be mitigated by quick responses. Aside from a few anecdotes, however, little is known about the decision-making process that leads to speedy responses and about its impeding and supporting antecedents. Using the organizational information-processing perspective, this empirical study unravels the disruption management process along a sequence of four stagesdisruption recognition, disruption diagnosis, response development, and response implementationand hypothesizes constraining and mediating effects of these stages. The findings contribute to an improved understanding of the role that the decision stages play in mitigating supply chain disruptions, and confirm the prediction that the speed with which information is processed and the stages are worked through positively affects supply chain performance. In addition, the findings suggest that one of the stages, diagnosis, acts as a constraining factor to the other stages. The stages also play a mediating role between the impact that the disruption has and a firm's readiness (prior to a disruption), dependence on a key supplier, and supply chain complexity. This provides guidance to decision makers in the application of resources both prior to a negative event and during a disruption recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:836 / 874
页数:39
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies
[2]   MANAGING STRATEGIC SURPRISE BY RESPONSE TO WEAK SIGNALS [J].
ANSOFF, HI .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1975, 18 (02) :21-33
[3]   The Architecture of complexity [J].
Barabasi, Albert-Lashlo .
IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2007, 27 (04) :33-42
[4]   Adapting to unfamiliar environmental events: A look at the evolution of interpretation and its role in strategic change [J].
Barr, PS .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1998, 9 (06) :644-669
[5]   The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs [J].
Bergkvist, Lars ;
Rossiter, John R. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2007, 44 (02) :175-184
[6]   A MODEL OF CRISIS PERCEPTION - A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS [J].
BILLINGS, RS ;
MILBURN, TW ;
SCHAALMAN, ML .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1980, 25 (02) :300-316
[7]   An empirically derived agenda of critical research issues for managing supply-chain disruptions [J].
Blackhurst, J ;
Craighead, CW ;
Elkins, D ;
Handfield, RB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2005, 43 (19) :4067-4081
[8]   Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply chain disruptions [J].
Bode, Christoph ;
Wagner, Stephan M. .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2015, 36 :215-228
[9]   MANAGING FINANCIALLY DISTRESSED SUPPLIERS: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY [J].
Bode, Christoph ;
Huebner, Denis ;
Wagner, Stephan M. .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2014, 50 (04) :24-43
[10]   UNDERSTANDING RESPONSES TO SUPPLY CHAIN DISRUPTIONS: INSIGHTS FROM INFORMATION PROCESSING AND RESOURCE DEPENDENCE PERSPECTIVES [J].
Bode, Christoph ;
Wagner, Stephan M. ;
Petersen, Kenneth J. ;
Ellram, Lisa M. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 54 (04) :833-856