Carbon dioxide emissions in the US economy - A structural decomposition analysis

被引:118
作者
Casler, SD
Rose, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Energy Environm & Mineral Econ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Allegheny Coll, Dept Econ, Meadville, PA 16335 USA
关键词
carbon dioxide emissions; energy use; structural decomposition analysis; technological change;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008224101980
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper provides an empirical analysis of the impact of various influences on carbon dioxide emissions. It incorporates methodological refinements of input-output structural decomposition analysis, which is the examination of economic change by means of a set of comparative static variations in key parameters of I-O tables. The analysis is performed using a two-tiered KLEM model, which allows for estimation of substitution and technological change effects within and between input aggregates. The model is used to decompose the sources of change in CO2 emissions in the U.S. over the 1972-82 timeframe using hybrid energy/value tables for the initial and terminal years. Results show the significant effect of substitution within the energy sector and between energy and other inputs as the leading causes of the decline in carbon dioxide emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 363
页数:15
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   MULTILEVEL DECOMPOSITION OF INDUSTRIAL ENERGY-CONSUMPTION [J].
ANG, BW .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1995, 17 (01) :39-51
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, INPUT OUTPUT EC
[3]  
[Anonymous], NETWORK ANAL MARINE
[4]  
Boyd G., 1987, ENERGY J, P77, DOI DOI 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-V0L8-N02-6
[5]  
BULLARD C, 1975, ENERG POLICY, V1, P268
[6]  
*BUR EC AN, 1979, SURVEY CURRENT BUSIN, V59
[7]  
*BUR EC AN, 1991, SURVEY CURRENT BUSIN, V71
[8]   READJUSTMENT POTENTIALS IN INDUSTRIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND STRUCTURE [J].
CASLER, S ;
HANNON, B .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1989, 17 (01) :93-108
[9]  
CASLER S, 1989, ENERGY FLOWS US EC 1
[10]   Economic structure, fuel combustion, and pollution emissions [J].
Casler, SD ;
Blair, PD .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 22 (01) :19-27