Labor productivity: Structural change and cyclical dynamics

被引:69
作者
Baily, MN [1 ]
Bartelsman, EJ
Haltiwanger, J
机构
[1] Free Univ Amsterdam, McKinsey Global Inst, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1162/00346530152480072
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A longstanding issue in empirical economics is the behavior of average labor productivity over the business cycle. This paper provides new insights into the cyclicality of aggregate labor productivity by examining the cyclical behavior of productivity at the plant level as well as the role of reallocation across plants over the cycle. We find that plant-level productivity is even more procyclical than aggregate productivity, because short-run reallocation yields a countercyclical contribution to labor productivity. At the plant level, we find that cyclicality of productivity varies systematically with long-run employment growth. Over the course of the cycle, plants that are long-run downsizers exhibit significantly greater procyclicality of productivity than do long-run upsizers. When we control for the direction of a cyclical shock, we find that the fall in productivity from an adverse cyclical shock for long-run downsizers is significantly larger in magnitude than is the fall in productivity from an equivalent adverse cyclical shock for long-run upsizers. We argue that these findings raise questions about one of the most popular explanations of procyclical productivity: changing factor utilization over the cycle.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 433
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
[2]  
BAILY MN, 1992, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P187
[3]   Downsizing and productivity growth: Myth or reality? [J].
Baily, MN ;
Bartelsman, EJ ;
Haltiwanger, J .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 1996, 8 (04) :259-278
[4]  
BARTELSMAN EJ, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P1075
[5]   Productivity dynamics: US manufacturing plants, 1972-1986 [J].
Bartelsman, EJ ;
Dhrymes, PJ .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 1998, 9 (01) :5-34
[6]   Procyclical productivity: Increasing returns or cyclical utilization? [J].
Basu, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1996, 111 (03) :719-751
[7]   PROCYCLICAL LABOR PRODUCTIVITY AND COMPETING THEORIES OF THE BUSINESS-CYCLE - SOME EVIDENCE FROM INTERWAR UNITED-STATES MANUFACTURING-INDUSTRIES [J].
BERNANKE, BS ;
PARKINSON, ML .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1991, 99 (03) :439-459
[8]   INTRAINDUSTRY HETEROGENEITY AND THE GREAT-DEPRESSION - THE AMERICAN MOTOR-VEHICLES INDUSTRY, 1929-1935 [J].
BRESNAHAN, TF ;
RAFF, DMG .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY, 1991, 51 (02) :317-331
[9]   LABOR HOARDING AND THE BUSINESS-CYCLE [J].
BURNSIDE, C ;
EICHENBAUM, M ;
REBELO, S .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1993, 101 (02) :245-273
[10]  
CABALLERO RJ, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P1350