Improved Method to Calculate a Water Poverty Index at Local Scale

被引:106
作者
Gine Garriga, Ricard [1 ]
Perez Foguet, Agusti [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Res Grp Cooperat & Human Dev, Sch Civil Engn, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Dept Appl Math 3, Res Grp Cooperat & Human Dev, Sch Civil Engn, Barcelona, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE | 2010年 / 136卷 / 11期
关键词
Aggregates; Water management; Water shortage; Water allocation policy; Africa;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000255
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Water Poverty Index (WPI) was created as an interdisciplinary indicator to assess water stress and scarcity, linking physical estimates of water availability with the socioeconomic drivers of poverty. This index has found great relevance in policy making as an effective water management tool, particularly in resources allocation and prioritization processes. Two conceptual weaknesses exist in the current index: (1) inadequate technique to combine available data and (2) poor statistical properties of the resulting composite. The purpose of this paper is to propose a suitable methodology to assess water poverty that overcomes these weaknesses. To this end, a number of combinations to create the WPI have been considered, based on indicators selection criteria, simple aggregation functions and multivariate analysis. The approach adopted has been designed for universal application at local scale. To exemplify the utilization of each alternative method, they have been piloted and implemented in the Turkana District (Kenya) as a case study. The paper concludes that the weighted multiplicative function is the most appropriate aggregation method for estimation of water poverty. It is least eclipsing and ambiguous free function, and it does not allow compensability among different variables of the index.
引用
收藏
页码:1287 / 1298
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 20408 EUR EN JRC EUR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, ENV MONOGRAPHS, V83
[3]   An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development [J].
Booysen, F .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2002, 59 (02) :115-151
[4]  
Cullis J., 2004, Water Policy, V6, P397
[5]  
Esty D.C., 2005, 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index
[6]  
FALKENMARK M, 1986, AMBIO, V15, P192
[7]  
Feitelson E., 2002, WATER POL, V4, P263, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00029-6
[8]  
GINE R, 2009, P 34 WEDC INT C WEDC
[9]  
*GOV KEN UNICEF, 2006, WAT SCH HLTH MAN INF
[10]   Multi-attributed environmental index construction [J].
Hajkowicz, S .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 57 (01) :122-139