Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in selected patients with severe carotid artery stenoses: The results of a consecutive series of 24 patients

被引:6
作者
Abrahamsen, J [1 ]
Roeder, OC [1 ]
Justesen, P [1 ]
Enevoldsen, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Physiol & Nucl Med, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
关键词
carotid artery stenosis; percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; duplex scanning;
D O I
10.1016/S1078-5884(98)80014-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: to assess clinically and with duplex scanning the results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in a subgroup of patients with carotid artery stenosis. Design: a retrospective study. Materials: twenty-four patients with focal hemispheric neurological symptoms from a concentric, smooth carotid stenosis more than 70% treated with balloon dilatation. Control investigations were performed with duplex scanning. Results: angiography after PTA revealed no residual stenosis in 15 patients (62%), a stenosis of less than 50 was seen in seven patients (30%) and PTA was ineffective in, two patients (8%). Three patients (13%) had transient ischaemic attacks during the procedure but none had strokes. One patient experienced shout lasting paraesthesia of the arm a few hours after the PTA procedure. After a follow-up of a mean of 11 months (1-38) no recurrent symptoms had occurred. Clinical success was thus achieved in 22 of 24 patients (92%) At duplex scanning, 16 (66%) patients had no stenosis, six patients (30%) had a stenosis of 70%, one patient (4%) a stenosis of 80%, and one patient had an occluded carotid artery. Conclusion: our results indicate that PTA in a selected group of patients with carotid artery stenosis is safe and the interim, long-term results are promising. The procedure must be evaluated in a randomised prospective study against surgical treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 442
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Andersen P E, 1997, Ugeskr Laeger, V159, P6221
[2]   Concern about safety of carotid angioplasty [J].
Beebe, HG ;
Archie, JP ;
Baker, WH ;
Barnes, RW ;
Becker, GJ ;
Bernstein, EF ;
Brener, B ;
Clagett, GP ;
Clowes, AW ;
Cooke, JP ;
Creager, MA ;
Cronenwett, JL ;
Dake, M ;
DeWeese, JA ;
Fogarty, TJ ;
Freischlag, JA ;
Goldstone, J ;
Greenfield, LJ ;
Hertzer, NR ;
Hobson, RW ;
Joyce, JW ;
Katzen, BT ;
LoGerfo, FW ;
Mohr, JP ;
Moore, WS ;
Najafi, H ;
Ricotta, JJ ;
Riles, TS ;
Ring, EJ ;
Robertson, J ;
Rutherford, RB ;
Sos, T ;
Stanley, JC ;
Strandness, DE ;
Sumner, DS ;
Toole, J ;
Towne, JB ;
Veith, FJ ;
Whittemore, AD ;
Yao, JST ;
Zarins, CK .
STROKE, 1996, 27 (02) :197-198
[3]  
BELLIN A, 1990, BYTE, V15, P281
[4]  
BOCKENHEIMER SAM, 1983, AM J NEURORADIOL, V4, P791
[5]  
Diethrich EB, 1996, J ENDOVASC SURG, V3, P42, DOI 10.1583/1074-6218(1996)003<0042:SITCAI>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
Grotta J, 1997, CIRCULATION, V95, P303
[8]  
GRUNTZIG A, 1974, DEUT MED WOCHENSCHR, V99, P2502
[9]  
HASSO AN, 1981, AM J NEURORADIOL, V2, P175
[10]   A comparison of angioplasty with stenting versus endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis [J].
Jordan, WD ;
Schroeder, PT ;
Fisher, WS ;
McDowell, HA .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 11 (01) :2-8