Big questions in public network management research

被引:649
作者
Agranoff, R [1 ]
McGuire, M
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Bloomington, IN USA
[2] Univ N Texas, Denton, TX 76203 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003504
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
As the use of networks in public management increases, more and larger questions expand this research arena. In many ways, public network management is in search of a paradigm equivalent to the hierarchical-organizational authority paradigm of bureaucratic management. We raise and offer preliminary answers to seven metaquestions that address the nature of network management tasks, group process in collaboration, flexibility of networks, self-responsibility and public agency accountability, the cohesive factor of networks, power and its effect on group problem resolution, and the results of network management. The light we shed on these issues by examining the black box of networks is designed to contribute to building an empirically derived knowledge base of network management.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 326
页数:32
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Expanding intergovernmental management's hidden dimensions [J].
Agranoff, R ;
McGuire, M .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1999, 29 (04) :352-369
[2]  
AGRANOFF R, 1991, IOWAS RURAL POLICY A
[3]  
Agranoff Robert., 1999, POLICY STUDIES REV, V16, P18
[4]  
Agranoff Robert., 1998, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, V8, P67, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024374, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JPART.A024374]
[5]  
Alinsky Saul., 1971, Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals
[6]  
Alter Catherine., 1993, ORG WORKING TOGETHER
[7]  
[Anonymous], J PUBLIC ADM RES THE
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1998, MANAGERIAL CRAFTSMAN
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Liberation management
[10]  
[Anonymous], J PUBLIC ADM RES THE