Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs

被引:1436
作者
Bakeman, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
Repeat Measure Design; Lowercase Letter; Repeated Measure Factor; Effect Size Measure; Standard Statistical Package;
D O I
10.3758/BF03192707
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Investigators, who are increasingly implored to present and discuss effect size statistics, might comply more often if they understood more clearly what is required. When investigators wish to report effect sizes derived from analyses of variance that include repeated measures, past advice has been problematic. Only recently has a generally useful effect size statistic been proposed for such designs: generalized eta squared (eta(2)(G); Olejnik & Algina, 2003). Here, we present this method, explain that eta(2)(G) preferred to eta squared and partial eta squared because it provides comparability across between-subjects and within-subjects designs, show that it can easily be computed from information provided by standard statistical packages, and recommend that investigators provide it routinely in their research reports when appropriate.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 384
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   The development of symbol-infused joint engagement [J].
Adamson, LB ;
Bakeman, R ;
Deckner, DF .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 75 (04) :1171-1187
[2]  
APA, 2001, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, V5th, DOI DOI 10.1037/0000165-000
[3]  
BAKEMAN R, 1992, UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL
[4]  
Bakeman R., 2005, Understanding statistics in the behavioral sciences, DOI 10. 4324 /
[5]   Meta-analysis of raw mean differences [J].
Bond, CF ;
Wiitala, WL ;
Richard, FD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 8 (04) :406-418
[6]  
Cohen J., 2003, Applied multiple regression. Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V3rd
[7]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[8]   Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals, but can't make them think - Statistical reform lessons from medicine [J].
Fidler, F ;
Thomason, N ;
Cumming, G ;
Finch, S ;
Leeman, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (02) :119-126
[9]   The metric comparability of meta-analytic effect-size estimators from factorial designs [J].
Gillett, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 8 (04) :419-433
[10]  
Glass G.V., 1981, Meta-analysis in social research