Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization

被引:426
作者
Janowski, Tomasz [1 ]
机构
[1] UNU EGOV, P-4810445 Guimaraes, Portugal
关键词
Digital technology; Digital Government; Digital Government Evolution; Digital Government Innovation; Digital Government Institutionalization; Digital Government Research; ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT; PUBLIC-SECTOR; LOCAL-GOVERNMENTS; SOCIAL MEDIA; GOVERNANCE; INFORMATION; READINESS; FRAMEWORK; USAGE; CORRUPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The Digital Government landscape is continuously changing to reflect how governments are trying to find innovative digital solutions to social, economic, political and other pressures, and how they transform themselves in the process. Understanding and predicting such changes is important for policymakers, government executives, researchers and all those who prepare, make, implement or evaluate Digital Government decisions. This article argues that the concept of Digital Government evolves toward more complexity and greater contextualization and specialization, similar to evolution-like processes that lead to changes in cultures and societies. To this end, the article presents a four-stage Digital Government Evolution Model comprising Digitization (Technology in Government), Transformation (Electronic Government), Engagement (Electronic Governance) and Contextualization (Policy-Driven Electronic Governance) stages; provides some evidence in support of this model drawing upon the study of the Digital Government literature published in Government Information Quarterly between 1992 and 2014; and presents a Digital Government Stage Analysis Framework to explain the evolution. As the article consolidates a representative body of the Digital Government literature, it could be also used for defining and integrating future research in the area. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 236
页数:16
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]   A cross-cultural comparison of Kuwaiti and British citizens' views of e-government interface quality [J].
Aladwani, Adel M. .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2013, 30 (01) :74-86
[2]  
Almunawar M. N., 2012, E GOVERNANCE CIVIC E
[3]   Social media in public health care: Impact domain propositions [J].
Andersen, Kim Normann ;
Medaglia, Rony ;
Henriksen, Helle Zinner .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2012, 29 (04) :462-469
[4]  
[Anonymous], MEAS INF SOC 2013
[5]  
[Anonymous], IEEE COMPUTER
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, MOB PRIV CONS RES IN
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Internet Security Threat Report
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Scopus
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Measuring the Information Society Report 2014
[10]   Does e-government reduce the administrative burden of businesses? An assessment of business-to-government systems usage in the Netherlands [J].
Arendsen, Rex ;
Peters, Oscar ;
ter Hedde, Marc ;
van Dijk, Jan .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2014, 31 (01) :160-169