Marketing mass-customized products: Striking a balance between utility and complexity

被引:236
作者
Dellaert, BGC [1 ]
Stremersch, S
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Fac Econ & Business Adm, Dept Marketing, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Emory Univ, Goizueta Business Sch, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Erasmus Univ, Sch Econ, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkr.42.2.219.62293
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Increasingly, firms allow consumers to mass customize their products. In this study, the authors investigate consumers' evaluations of different mass customization configurations when they are asked to mass customize a product. For example, mass customization configurations may differ in the number of modules that can be mass customized. In the context of mass customization of personal computers, the authors find that mass customization configuration affects the product utility that consumers can achieve in mass customization as well as their perception of mass customization complexity. In turn, product utility and complexity affect the utility that consumers derive from using a certain mass customization configuration. More specifically, product utility has a positive effect and complexity has a negative effect on mass customization utility. The effect of complexity is direct as well as indirect because complexity also lowers product utility. The authors also find that consumers with high levels of product expertise consider mass customization configurations less complex than do consumers with low levels of product expertise and that for more-expert consumers, complexity has a less-negative impact on product utility. The study has important managerial implications for how companies can design their mass customization configuration to increase utility and decrease complexity.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 227
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   DIMENSIONS OF CONSUMER EXPERTISE [J].
ALBA, JW ;
HUTCHINSON, JW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1987, 13 (04) :411-454
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Journal of Interactive Marketing
[3]   Measuring the influence of individual preference structures in group decision making [J].
Arora, N ;
Allenby, GM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1999, 36 (04) :476-487
[4]   Extending discrete choice models to incorporate attitudinal and other latent variables [J].
Ashok, K ;
Dillon, WR ;
Yuan, S .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2002, 39 (01) :31-46
[5]   A COMPONENTIAL ANALYSIS OF COGNITIVE EFFORT IN CHOICE [J].
BETTMAN, JR ;
JOHNSON, EJ ;
PAYNE, JW .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1990, 45 (01) :111-139
[6]   Consumers' perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: The impact of item reduction [J].
Broniarczyk, SM ;
Hoyer, WD ;
McAlister, L .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1998, 35 (02) :166-176
[7]   Conflict and loss aversion in multiattribute choice: The effects of trade-off size and reference dependence on decision difficulty [J].
Chatterjee, S ;
Heath, TB .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 67 (02) :144-155
[8]   An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: Moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors [J].
Dabholkar, PA ;
Bagozzi, RP .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2002, 30 (03) :184-201
[9]   Asymmetric competition in choice and the leveraging of competitive disadvantages [J].
Heath, TB ;
Ryu, G ;
Chatterjee, S ;
McCarthy, MS ;
Mothersbaugh, DL ;
Milberg, S ;
Gaeth, GJ .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2000, 27 (03) :291-308
[10]   THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ALTERNATIVE PREFERENCE ELICITATION PROCEDURES IN PREDICTING CHOICE [J].
HUBER, J ;
WITTINK, DR ;
FIEDLER, JA ;
MILLER, R .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1993, 30 (01) :105-114