Identification of variables needed to risk adjust outcomes of coronary interventions: Evidence-based guidelines for efficient data collection

被引:79
作者
Block, PC
Peterson, EC
Krone, R
Kesler, K
Hannan, E
O'Connor, GT
Detre, K
机构
[1] Providence St Vincent Med Ctr, Inst Heart, Portland, OR 97225 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Community & Family Med, Div Biometry, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, St Louis, MO USA
[5] SUNY Albany, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[6] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Med, Ctr Evaluat Hlth Sci, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00208-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. Our objectives were to identify and define a mini mum set of variables for interventional cardiology that carried the most statistical weight for predicting adverse outcomes, Though "gaming" cannot be completely avoided, variables were to be as objective as possible and reproducible and had to be predictive of outcome in current databases. Background, Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions depend on patient risk characteristics and disease severity and acuity, Comparing results of interventions has been difficult because definitions of similar variables differ in databases, and variables are not uniformly tracked. Identifying the best predictor variables and standardizing their definitions are a first step in developing a universal stratification instrument. Methods. A list of empirically derived variables was first tested in eight cardiac databases (158,273 cases). Three end points (in-hospital death, in hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery, Q wave myocardial infarction) were chosen for analysis, Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to quantify the predictive value of the variable in each database, The variables were then defined by consensus by a panel of experts. Results. In all databases patient demographics were similar, but disease severity varied greatly. The most powerful predictors of adverse outcome were measures of hemodynamic instability, disease severity, demographics and comorbid conditions in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions. Our analysis identified 29 variables that have the strongest statistical association with adverse outcomes after coronary interventions. These variables were also objectively defined. Incorporation of these variables into every cardiac dataset will provide uniform standards for data collected, Comparisons of outcomes among physicians, institutions and databases will therefore be more meaningful. (C) 1998 by the American College of Cardiology.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 282
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   PREDICTION OF RISK FOR HEMODYNAMIC COMPROMISE DURING PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY [J].
BERGELSON, BA ;
JACOBS, AK ;
CUPPLES, LA ;
RUOCCO, NA ;
KYLLER, MG ;
RYAN, TJ ;
FAXON, DP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1992, 70 (20) :1540-1545
[2]   Angiographic correlates of lesion relevance and suitability for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Study (BARI) [J].
Botas, J ;
Stadius, ML ;
Bourassa, MG ;
Rosen, AD ;
Schaff, HV ;
Sopko, G ;
Williams, DO ;
McMillan, A ;
Alderman, EL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 77 (10) :805-814
[3]   AN INTRODUCTION TO A BAYESIAN METHOD FOR META-ANALYSIS - THE CONFIDENCE PROFILE METHOD [J].
EDDY, DM ;
HASSELBLAD, V ;
SHACHTER, R .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1990, 10 (01) :15-23
[4]   PREDICTORS OF SUCCESS FOR CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY PERFORMED FOR ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
ELLIS, SG ;
TOPOL, EJ ;
GALLISON, L ;
GRINES, CL ;
LANGBURD, AB ;
BATES, ER ;
WALTON, JA ;
ONEILL, WW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1988, 12 (06) :1407-1415
[5]   Analysis and comparison of operator-specific outcomes in interventional cardiology - From a multicenter database of 4860 quality-controlled procedures [J].
Ellis, SG ;
Omoigui, N ;
Bittl, JA ;
Lincoff, M ;
Wolfe, MW ;
Howell, G ;
Topol, EJ .
CIRCULATION, 1996, 93 (03) :431-439
[6]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[7]   PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY IN NEW-YORK-STATE - RISK-FACTORS AND OUTCOMES [J].
HANNAN, EL ;
ARANI, DT ;
JOHNSON, LW ;
KEMP, HG ;
LUKACIK, G .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (21) :3092-3097
[8]   METAANALYTIC TOOLS FOR MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING - A PRACTICAL GUIDE [J].
HASSELBLAD, VIC ;
MCCRORY, DC .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1995, 15 (01) :81-96
[9]  
Hedges L.V., 1985, STAT METHODS METAANA, P22
[10]   Identification of preoperative variables needed for risk adjustment of short-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery [J].
Jones, RH ;
Hannan, EL ;
Hammermeister, KE ;
DeLong, ER ;
OConnor, GT ;
Luepker, RV ;
Parsonnet, V ;
Pryor, DB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 28 (06) :1478-1487