Identification of chemistry-dependent artifacts on gravimetric PM fine readings at the T1 site during the MILAGRO field campaign

被引:6
作者
Moya, M. [1 ,2 ]
Madronich, S. [3 ]
Retama, A. [4 ]
Weber, R. [5 ]
Baumann, K.
Nenes, A. [5 ]
Castillejos, M. [6 ]
Ponce de Leon, C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosio, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[4] Direcc Monitoreo Atmosfer, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[5] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Earth & Atmospher Sci, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[6] Univ Autonoma Metropolitana Xochimilco, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
MILAGRO; Mexico City; Particulate matter; Air pollution; AEROSOL MASS-SPECTROMETRY; PARTICULATE AIR-POLLUTION; MEXICO-CITY AEROSOL; SAMPLER;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.059
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As part of the MIRAGE (MILAGRO) study conducted 7-30 March 2006 in Mexico City and its Metropolitan Area (MCMA), fine particulate matter (PM2.5) was collected using two Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM) systems, and a Partisol instrument at the T1 super-site (Tecamac, State of Mexico). Inorganic analysis was performed on filter-based (PM1, PM2.5-URG) measurements also collected at this site. Measurements from the gravimetric (TEOMs, Partisol) and URG systems were inter-compared with chemical speciation measurements using a Particle Into Liquid Sampler (PILS) and Thermal Optical methods. Mass and chemical balances applied over the first part of the study (11-22 March) showed that a TEOM using a device (SES) which reduces particle-bound water and retains a fraction of semi-volatile compounds (SVM) gives readings similar to 30% larger than a conventional TEOM. In the second part of the study (26-30 March), the loss of SVM during TEOM-heated filter collection (both systems) represented a significant fraction of PM2.5 mass due to changes in particle composition. Overall, when nonvolatile nitrate dominated (i.e., when associated with crustal species and not NH4+) and/or sulfate dominates (SO42-/NO3- molar ratio is >1), PM2.5 mass readings are in agreement with those reported for the T1 site if TEOM is using a SES device. However, when volatile nitrate dominates (i.e., NH4NO3) or SO42-/NO3- molar ratio is <1, a larger fraction is lost from both TEOMs (with or without the SES device). Under the latter regime, uncertainties are large and gravimetric losses may reach 30%-50%. The gravimetric PARTISOL instrument recorded lower readings under all of the aforementioned conditions with differences versus TEOMs decreasing with increasing RH. These findings call for a careful characterization of such volatilization biases to improve current PM (PM10. PM2.5) measurements/networks, especially in alkaline-rich environments that can favor such biases. With regards to PM1 and PM2.5 filter-based measurements, findings are: 1) crustal-related elements are important features in the PM2.5-1 size fraction; 2) a factor of similar to 2 overestimation of SO42- concentrations is recorded on substrates during PM collection and 3) main elements of a typical urban aerosol size distribution are concentrated in the 1 mu m (versus 2.5 mu m) size fraction. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 252
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Mexico City aerosol analysis during MILAGRO using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry at the urban supersite (T0) - Part 1: Fine particle composition and organic source apportionment [J].
Aiken, A. C. ;
Salcedo, D. ;
Cubison, M. J. ;
Huffman, J. A. ;
DeCarlo, P. F. ;
Ulbrich, I. M. ;
Docherty, K. S. ;
Sueper, D. ;
Kimmel, J. R. ;
Worsnop, D. R. ;
Trimborn, A. ;
Northway, M. ;
Stone, E. A. ;
Schauer, J. J. ;
Volkamer, R. M. ;
Fortner, E. ;
de Foy, B. ;
Wang, J. ;
Laskin, A. ;
Shutthanandan, V. ;
Zheng, J. ;
Zhang, R. ;
Gaffney, J. ;
Marley, N. A. ;
Paredes-Miranda, G. ;
Arnott, W. P. ;
Molina, L. T. ;
Sosa, G. ;
Jimenez, J. L. .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2009, 9 (17) :6633-6653
[2]   Evaluation of the TEOM(R) method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas [J].
Allen, G ;
Sioutas, C ;
Koutrakis, P ;
Reiss, R ;
Lurmann, FW ;
Roberts, PT .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 1997, 47 (06) :682-689
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Gothenburg Protocol to reduce transboundary air pollution, DOI DOI 10.5860/CHOICE.44-4512
[4]  
Castillejos M., 2003, REPORTE FINAL PROYEC
[5]  
CEN (European Committee for Standarization), 2003, 264WG15N220 CENTC
[6]  
Chow J.C., 2005, J AIR WASTE MANAGEME, V45, P320
[7]   Chapter one: exposure measurements [J].
Chow, JC ;
Engelbrecht, JP ;
Freeman, NCG ;
Hashim, JH ;
Jantunen, M ;
Michaud, JP ;
de Tejada, SS ;
Watson, JG ;
Wei, FS ;
Wilson, WE ;
Yasuno, M ;
Zhu, T .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2002, 49 (09) :873-901
[8]   EVALUATION OF FILTER-BASED AEROSOL MEASUREMENTS DURING THE 1987 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AIR-QUALITY STUDY [J].
CHOW, JC ;
FUJITA, EM ;
WATSON, JG ;
LU, ZQ ;
LAWSON, DR ;
ASBAUGH, LL .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 1994, 30 (01) :49-80
[9]   Fine particulate air pollution and hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases [J].
Dominici, F ;
Peng, RD ;
Bell, ML ;
Pham, L ;
McDermott, A ;
Zeger, SL ;
Samet, JM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (10) :1127-1134
[10]   A MULTIPLE-SYSTEM, MULTICHANNEL DIFFUSION DENUDER SAMPLER FOR THE DETERMINATION OF FINE-PARTICULATE ORGANIC MATERIAL IN THE ATMOSPHERE [J].
EATOUGH, DJ ;
WADSWORTH, A ;
EATOUGH, DA ;
CRAWFORD, JW ;
HANSEN, LD ;
LEWIS, EA .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1993, 27 (08) :1213-1219