Classifying technology policy from an evolutionary perspective

被引:92
作者
Cantner, U
Pyka, A
机构
[1] Univ Jena, Wirtschaftswissensch Fak, D-07743 Jena, Germany
[2] Univ Pierre Mendes, SERD, INRA, F-38040 Grenoble 9, France
关键词
mission-oriented policy; diffusion-oriented policy; technological specificity; market vicinity;
D O I
10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00104-9
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
For the classification of technology policy in an evolutionary framework the taxonomy of mission- and diffusion-oriented policy design introduced by Ergas [Ergas, H. (1987), The importance of technology policy, in: Dasgupta, P., Stoneman, P (eds.), Economic Policy and Technological Performance, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.] is useful. However, Ergas' indirect method of identifying the respective policy style is only able to give a first and rough insight in the technology policy of a specific country. To improve on that, we developed a so-called direct method aiming at a sound characterization of single policy measures and giving a more detailed picture about policy orientation. To demonstrate the basic procedure of the suggested approach, it is applied empirically on the German technology policy of the last 2 decades. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 775
页数:17
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   COLLECTIVE INVENTION [J].
ALLEN, RC .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1983, 4 (01) :1-24
[2]  
[Anonymous], HDB EC INNOVATION TE
[3]  
Cantner U., 1998, Industrial and Corporate Change, V7, P369, DOI DOI 10.1093/ICC/7.2.369
[4]  
CANTNER U, 1997, IFOSTUDIEN, V43, P287
[5]  
CARLSSON B, 1995, IND CORP CHANGE, V7, P369
[6]   Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1989, 99 (397) :569-596
[7]  
CONESA E, 1997, EAEPE C ATH GREEC NO
[8]  
Cowan R., 1997, Ind Corp Change, V6, P595, DOI DOI 10.1093/ICC/6.3.595
[9]  
DOSI G, 1994, J EVOLUTIONARY EC, V4, P15
[10]   THE FIRM AS A COMPETENT TEAM [J].
ELIASSON, G .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1990, 13 (03) :275-298