Efficacy and tolerability of tricyclic antidepressants and SSRIs compared with placebo for treatment of depression in primary care: A meta-analysis

被引:222
作者
Arroll, B
Macgillivray, S
Ogston, S
Reid, I
Sullivan, F
Williams, B
Crombie, I
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Gen Practice & Primary Hlth Care, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Dundee, Dept Community Hlth Serv, Dundee, Scotland
[3] Univ Dundee, Dept Psychiat, Dundee, Scotland
[4] Univ Dundee, Dept Social Work, Dundee, Scotland
关键词
antidepressant agents; tricyclic; antidepressive agents; second-generation; placebo; primary health care;
D O I
10.1370/afm.349
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
PURPOSE Depression is common in primary care. There are no systematic reviews of depression treatment comparing antidepressants with placebo; hence, we do not know whether these medications are effective in primary care. METHODS We searched the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group register of controlled trials, MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical abstracts, PsycINFO, and EMBASE. Abstracts of potential studies were reviewed independently by 2 authors. Studies needed to include randomized controlled trials of either a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), or both, and placebo in a primary care setting. The data and quality of the studies were extracted and assessed by 2 authors blind to the other's choice. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. The main outcome measures were the standardized mean difference and weighted mean difference of the final mean depression scores, the relative risk of improvement, and the number withdrawing of side effects. Pooling of results was done using Review Manager 4.2.2. because. RESULTS There were 10 studies in which TCAs were compared with placebo, 3 in which SSRIs were compared with placebo, and 2 with both compared with placebo. One half of the studies were of low methodological quality, and nearly all studies were of short duration, typically 6 to 8 weeks. Pooled estimates of efficacy data showed a relative risk of 1.26 (95% Cl, 1.12-1.42) for improvement with TCAs compared with placebo; For SSRIs, relative risk was 1.37 (95% CI, 1.21-1.55). Most patients, 56% to 60%, responded well to active treatment compared with 42% to 47% for placebo. The number needed to treat for TCAs was about 4, and for SSRIs it was 6. The numbers needed to harm (for withdrawal caused by side effects) ranged from 5 to 11 for TCAs and 21 to 94 for SSRIs. Low-dose (100 mg or 75 mg) as well as high-dose TCAs were effective. CONCLUSION This systematic review is the first comparing antidepressants with placebo for treatment of depression in primary care. Both TCAs and SSRIs are effective. This review is also the first to show that low-dose TCAs are effective in primary care. Prescribing antidepressants in primary care is a more effective clinical activity than prescribing placebo.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 456
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
*AM PSYCH ASS, 1993, AM J PSYCHIAT S4, V150
[2]   Meta-analytical studies on new antidepressants [J].
Anderson, IM .
BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2001, 57 :161-178
[3]   TREATMENT DISCONTINUATION WITH SELECTIVE SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS COMPARED WITH TRICYCLIC ANTIDEPRESSANTS - A METAANALYSIS [J].
ANDERSON, IM ;
TOMENSON, BM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6992) :1433-1438
[4]  
[Anonymous], ANN M AM MED ASS NEW
[5]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE LIB
[6]  
Arroll B, 2002, NEW ZEAL MED J, V115, P176
[7]  
ARYA R, 1999, CURR OPIN, V12, P103
[8]   Effects of antidepressant treatment on the quality of daily life: An experience sampling study [J].
Barge-Schaapveld, DQCM ;
Nicolson, NA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 63 (06) :477-485
[9]   CONTROLLED TRIAL OF AMITRIPTYLINE IN GENERAL PRACTICE [J].
BLASHKI, TG ;
MOWBRAY, R ;
DAVIES, B .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1971, 1 (5741) :133-+
[10]  
BRINK CW, 1984, J DRUG THER RES, V9, P513