Equilibrium theory revisited: Mutual gaze and personal space in virtual environments

被引:327
作者
Bailenson, JN [1 ]
Blascovich, J [1 ]
Beall, AC [1 ]
Loomis, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Psychol, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
来源
PRESENCE-VIRTUAL AND AUGMENTED REALITY | 2001年 / 10卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1162/105474601753272844
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
During the last half of the twentieth century, psychologists and anthropologists have studied proxemics, or spacing behavior, among people in many contexts. As we enter the twenty-first century, immersive virtual environment technology promises new experimental venues in which researchers can study proxemics. Immersive virtual environments provide realistic and compelling experimental settings without sacrificing experimental control. The experiment reported here tested Argyle and Dean's (1965) equilibrium theory's specification of an inverse relationship between mutual gaze, a nonverbal cue signaling intimacy, and interpersonal distance. Participants were immersed in a three-dimensional virtual room in which a virtual human representation (that is, an embodied agent) stood. Under the guise of a memory task, participants walked towards and around the agent. Distance between the participant and agent was tracked automatically via our immersive virtual environment system. All participants maintained more space around agents than they did around similarly sized and shaped but nonhuman-like objects. Female participants maintained more interpersonal distance between themselves and agents who engaged them in eye contact (that is, mutual gaze behavior) than between themselves and agents who did not engage them in eye contact, whereas male participants did not. Implications are discussed for the study of proxemics via immersive virtual environment technology, as well as the design of virtual environments and virtual humans.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 598
页数:16
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Aaronson E., 1968, HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOL, V2nd, P1
[2]   INTERPERSONAL DISTANCE AS A FUNCTION OF TASK DIFFICULTY, PRAISE, STATUS ORIENTATION, AND SEX OF PARTNER [J].
ADLER, LL ;
IVERSON, MA .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1974, 39 (02) :683-692
[3]   FURTHER LOOK AT EQUILIBRIUM-THEORY - VISUAL INTERACTION AS A FUNCTION OF INTERPERSONAL DISTANCE [J].
AIELLO, JR .
ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY AND NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1977, 1 (02) :122-140
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1970, PROXEMIC BEHAV CROSS
[5]   EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION [J].
ARGYLE, M ;
DEAN, J .
SOCIOMETRY, 1965, 28 (03) :289-304
[6]   MEANING OF 5 PATTERNS OF GAZE [J].
ARGYLE, M ;
LEFEBVRE, L ;
COOK, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 4 (02) :125-136
[7]  
Argyle Michael, 1976, Gaze and mutual gaze
[8]  
Argyle Michael, 1988, Bodily communication, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203753835
[9]  
BADLER NI, 1999, P SIGGRAPH 99, P1
[10]  
Biocca F., 1995, COMMUNICATION AGE VI