Current challenges in clinimetrics

被引:162
作者
de Vet, HCW [1 ]
Terwee, CB [1 ]
Bouter, LM [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Ctr Med, Inst Res Extramural Med, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.08.012
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Clinimetrics is a methodologic discipline that focuses on the quality of clinical measurements, for example, diagnostic characteristics and disease outcomes. Different clinimetric properties, such as reproducibility and responsiveness, are important in both the development and the evaluation of measurement instruments. This article presents a number of the cur-rent challenges in clinimetrics: there is much confusion with regard to terminology, clinimetric properties are population and situation-dependent, and the abundance of different measurement instruments in specific fields hampers the comparison of study results. Further challenges lie in the improvement of the quality of both the measurement instruments and the performance of the actual measurements, and the assessment of the suitability for use in clinical practice. From the perspective of evidence-based medicine, it is essential to have measurement instruments that make it possible to detect clinically relevant improvements that are due to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Close collaboration between clinicians, statisticians, epidemiologists, and psychologists is necessary to guarantee healthy future developments in clinimetrics, serving the needs of both clinical research and clinical practice. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1137 / 1141
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   A taxonomy for responsiveness [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Katz, JN ;
Wright, JG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (12) :1204-1217
[2]   A systematic review of the content and quality of wrist outcome instruments [J].
Bialocerkowski, AE ;
Grimmer, KA ;
Bain, GI .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 12 (02) :149-157
[3]   A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments [J].
Coons, SJ ;
Rao, S ;
Keininger, DL ;
Hays, RD .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2000, 17 (01) :13-35
[4]   Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures - Theoretical considerations illustrated by an empirical example [J].
de Vet, HCW ;
Bouter, LM ;
Bezemer, PD ;
Beurskens, AJHM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2001, 17 (04) :479-487
[5]  
DEVET HCW, 1998, ENCY BIOSTATISTICA, V4, P3123
[6]  
FEINSTEIN A.R., 1987, CLINIMETRICS
[7]   AN ADDITIONAL BASIC SCIENCE FOR CLINICAL MEDICINE .4. THE DEVELOPMENT OF CLINIMETRICS [J].
FEINSTEIN, AR .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1983, 99 (06) :843-848
[8]   MEASURING CHANGE OVER TIME - ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF EVALUATIVE INSTRUMENTS [J].
GUYATT, G ;
WALTER, S ;
NORMAN, G .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (02) :171-178
[9]   MEASURING HEALTH-STATUS - WHAT ARE THE NECESSARY MEASUREMENT PROPERTIES [J].
GUYATT, GH ;
KIRSHNER, B ;
JAESCHKE, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (12) :1341-1345
[10]  
Hambleton RK, 1985, ITEM RESPONSE THEORY