Has economic analysis improved regulatory decisions?

被引:74
作者
Hahn, Robert W. [1 ,2 ]
Tetlock, Paul C.
机构
[1] AEI Brookings Joint Ctr Regulat Studies, Washington, DC USA
[2] Amer Enterprise Inst Publ Policy Res, Washington, DC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1257/jep.22.1.67
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In response to the increasing impact of regulation, several governments have introduced economic analysis as a way of trying to improve regulatory policy. This paper provides a comprehensive assessment of government-supported economic analysis of regulation. We find that there is growing interest in the use of economic tools, such as benefit-cost analysis; however, the quality of analysis in the U.S. and European Union frequently fails to meet widely accepted guidelines. Furthermore, the relationship between analysis and policy decisions is tenuous. To address this situation, we recommend pursuing an agenda in which economics plays a more central role in regulatory decision making. In addition, we suggest that prediction markets could help improve regulatory policy and improve measurement of the impact of regulation.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 84
页数:18
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, A94 OFF MAN BUDG
[2]   Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation? [J].
Arrow, KJ ;
Cropper, ML ;
Eads, GC ;
Hahn, RW ;
Lave, LB ;
Noll, RG ;
Portney, PR ;
Russell, M ;
Schmalensee, R ;
Smith, VK ;
Stavins, RN .
SCIENCE, 1996, 272 (5259) :221-222
[3]  
ARROW KJ, 2007, RELATED PUBLICATION, V711
[4]  
BERG J, 2003, UNPUB RESULTS DOZEN
[5]  
*C BUDG OFF, 1997, REG IMP AN COSTS SEL
[6]   Sulfur dioxide control by electric utilities: What are the gains from trade? [J].
Carlson, C ;
Burtraw, D ;
Cropper, M ;
Palmer, KL .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2000, 108 (06) :1292-1326
[7]  
DeMuth Christopher, 1994, AM EC POLICY 1980S, p[508, 504]
[8]  
*EPA, 1990, ENV INV COST CLEAN E
[9]  
European Commission, 2002, COM2002, P276
[10]  
FARROW S, 2000, IMPROVING REGULATORY