An Empirical Analysis of Auditor Independence in the Banking Industry

被引:166
作者
Kanagaretnam, Kiridaran [1 ]
Krishnan, Gopal V. [2 ]
Lobo, Gerald J. [3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[2] Lehigh Univ, Bethlehem, PA USA
[3] Univ Houston, Houston, TX 77004 USA
关键词
auditor independence; earnings management; auditor fees; bank loan loss provision; FDICIA; LOAN LOSS PROVISIONS; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; NONAUDIT SERVICES; ACCRUALS; QUALITY; MODELS; FEES;
D O I
10.2308/accr.2010.85.6.2011
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine auditor independence in the banking industry by analyzing the relation between fees paid to auditors and the extent of earnings management through loan loss provisions (LLP). We also examine whether this relation differs across large banks whose managements are required under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act to evaluate internal control over financial reporting and whose auditors must attest to the effectiveness of such internal controls, and small banks that are not subject to those requirements. We find that unexpected auditor fees are unrelated to earnings management for large banks. For small banks, we find greater earnings management via under-provisioning of LLP by banks that pay higher unexpected total and nonaudit fees to the auditor. These results suggest that auditor fee dependence on the audit client is associated with earnings management via abnormal LLP and is a potential threat to auditor independence for small banks. Our findings are relevant to policymakers contemplating new regulations in light of the recent banking crisis.
引用
收藏
页码:2011 / 2046
页数:36
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Bank loan loss provisions: a reexamination of capital management, earnings management and signaling effects [J].
Ahmed, AS ;
Takeda, C ;
Thomas, S .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1999, 28 (01) :1-25
[2]  
Aiken LS., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[3]   How does internal control regulation affect financial reporting? [J].
Altamuro, Jennifer ;
Beatty, Anne .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2010, 49 (1-2) :58-74
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1972, Research on Human Behavior: A Systematic Guide to Method
[5]   Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence [J].
Ashbaugh, H ;
LaFond, R ;
Mayhew, BW .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2003, 78 (03) :611-639
[6]   Discretionary behavior with respect to allowances for loan losses and the behavior of security prices [J].
Beaver, WH ;
Engel, EE .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1996, 22 (1-3) :177-206
[7]   FDICIA after five years [J].
Benston, GJ ;
Kaufman, GG .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1997, 11 (03) :139-158
[8]  
BORITZ JE, 1997, J ACCOUNTING AUDITIN, V12, P353
[9]   Audit pricing, legal liability regimes, and Big 4 premiums: Theory and cross-country evidence [J].
Choi, Jong-Hag ;
Kim, Jeong-Bon ;
Liu, Xiaohong ;
Simunic, Dan A. .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2008, 25 (01) :55-+
[10]   BANK DIFFERENCES IN THE COORDINATION OF REGULATORY CAPITAL, EARNINGS, AND TAXES [J].
COLLINS, JH ;
SHACKELFORD, DA ;
WAHLEN, JM .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1995, 33 (02) :263-291