Application of a Landscape Development Intensity Index for Assessing Wetlands in Taiwan

被引:24
作者
Chen, Tien-Shui [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Hsing-Juh [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Dept Life Sci, Taichung 402, Taiwan
[2] Endem Species Res Inst, Jiji 552, Nantou, Taiwan
[3] Acad Sinica, Biodivers Res Ctr, Taipei 115, Taiwan
关键词
Anthropogenic disturbance; Biodiversity; Landscape development intensity (LDI) index; Land-use; FLORIDA; SCALE; OHIO;
D O I
10.1007/s13157-011-0191-6
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In 2007, the Taiwanese government used the criteria of species richness, degree of wilderness/representativeness/uniqueness, and appropriateness/reasonability to identify 74 wetlands as being of importance. They were ranked according to the order of importance and classified into three levels: wetlands of international, national, and local importance. We examined the landscape status of these wetlands, each including a 100-m-wide swath of surrounding land area and the wetland itself, and calculated landscape development intensity (LDI) index values, as used in earlier assessments in Florida, USA. The LDI index values were ranked and classified into three levels as done by the Taiwanese government. We compared the ranking of the LDI index values with those evaluated by the Taiwanese government and found that there was 67.6% congruency, suggesting that the LDI index can be used to assess the biodiversity status of wetlands. Our results also suggested that the LDI index can be used to assess coastal wetlands. This provides rapid and timely information on landscape development which can prove useful for managing wetlands in Taiwan. However, there was some variability between the two rankings, apparently resulting from the incongruence of some land-use categories used in Florida and Taiwan. It is recommended that Taiwan develop LDI coefficients corresponding to land-use categories based on its own natural and anthropogenic landscapes.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 756
页数:12
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], TAIWAN WETLANDS IMPO
[2]  
Barbier E.B., 1997, Economic Valuation of Wetlands. A Guide for Policy Makers and Planners
[3]   Landscape development intensity index [J].
Brown, MT ;
Vivas, MB .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2005, 101 (1-3) :289-309
[4]   The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J].
Costanza, R ;
dArge, R ;
deGroot, R ;
Farber, S ;
Grasso, M ;
Hannon, B ;
Limburg, K ;
Naeem, S ;
ONeill, RV ;
Paruelo, J ;
Raskin, RG ;
Sutton, P ;
vandenBelt, M .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) :253-260
[5]  
FINDLAY SC, 1997, CONSERV BIOL, V11, P1000
[6]   The effects of adjacent land use on wetland amphibian species richness and community composition [J].
Houlahan, JE ;
Findlay, CS .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2003, 60 (09) :1078-1094
[7]   Diatoms as indicators of isolated herbaceous wetland condition in Florida, USA [J].
Lane, Charles R. ;
Brown, Mark T. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2007, 7 (03) :521-540
[8]   Application of a vegetation-based index of biotic integrity for Lake Erie coastal marshes in Ohio [J].
Mack, John J. ;
Avdis, Nikki Husat ;
Braig, Eugene C. ;
Johnson, David L. .
AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM HEALTH & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 11 (01) :91-104
[9]   Developing a wetland IBI with statewide application after multiple testing iterations [J].
Mack, John J. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2007, 7 (04) :864-881
[10]   Landscape as a predictor of wetland condition: An evaluation of the Landscape Development Index (LDI) with a large reference wetland dataset from Ohio [J].
Mack, John J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2006, 120 (1-3) :221-241