Comparison of a combination of midazolam and diazepam and midazolam alone as oral premedication on preanesthetic and emergence condition in children

被引:34
作者
Arai, YCP [1 ]
Fukunaga, K [1 ]
Hirota, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Kochi Med Sch, Dept Anesthesiol, Nankoku, Kochi 7838505, Japan
关键词
diazepam; emergence agitation; midazolam; pediatric anesthesia; premedication; preoperative anxiety;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00700.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BAckground: Preanesthetic anxiety and emergence agitation are major challenges for anesthesiologists in pediatric anesthesia. Thus, midazolam has been used as premedication for children. However, midazolam alone is not effective for emergence agitation. The present study tested the effect of a combination of midazolam and diazepam on the preanesthetic condition and emergence behavior in children. Methods: Forty-two children were allocated to one of three groups: the NoPre group received no premedication; the Mi group received midazolam 0.5 mg kg(-1) orally; and the Mi + Di group received midazolam 0.25 mg kg(-1) and diazepam 0.25 mg kg(-1) orally. When anesthesia was induced with 7% sevoflurane in 100% oxygen, qualities of mask induction and sedation were rated. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (3-5%) in 100% oxygen. During emergence from anesthesia, the score of the child's emergence behavior was rated. Results: Children in the Mi and Mi + Di groups were more sedated than those in the NoPre group. A combination of midazolam and diazepam provided a better quality of mask induction, when compared with no premedication. Also, the children in the Mi + Di group were less agitated than those in the other groups during the emergence. Conclusion: Children in the Mi + Di group were significantly more sedated at induction of anesthesia and less agitated during emergence from anesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:698 / 701
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Preoperative anxiety is associated with a high incidence of problematic behavior on emergence after halothane anesthesia in boys [J].
Aono, J ;
Mamiya, K ;
Manabe, M .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 43 (05) :542-544
[2]   Oral Midazolam premedication in preadolescents and adolescents [J].
Brosius, KK ;
Bannister, CF .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (01) :31-36
[3]   The effect of fentanyl on the emergence characteristics after desflurane or sevoflurane anesthesia in children [J].
Cohen, IT ;
Finkel, JC ;
Hannallah, RS ;
Hummer, KA ;
Patel, KM .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (05) :1178-1181
[4]   Propofol or midazolam do not reduce the incidence of emergence agitation associated with desflurane anaesthesia in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy [J].
Cohen, IT ;
Drewsen, S ;
Hannallah, RS .
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 12 (07) :604-609
[5]   Emergence behaviour in children: defining the incidence of excitement and agitation following anaesthesia [J].
Cole, JW ;
Murray, DJ ;
McAllister, JD ;
Hirshberg, GE .
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 12 (05) :442-447
[6]  
Coté CJ, 2002, ANESTH ANALG, V94, P37
[7]   Emergence agitation in paediatric patients after sevoflurane anaesthesia and no surgery: a comparison with halothane [J].
Cravero, J ;
Surgenor, S ;
Whalen, K .
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 10 (04) :419-424
[8]   The effect of small dose fentanyl on the emergence characteristics of pediatric patients after sevoflurane anesthesia without surgery [J].
Cravero, JP ;
Beach, M ;
Thyr, B ;
Whalen, K .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 97 (02) :364-367
[9]   Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic consequences and clinical relevance of cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibition [J].
Dresser, GK ;
Spence, JD ;
Bailey, DG .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2000, 38 (01) :41-57
[10]  
Duggan M, 2002, CAN J ANAESTH, V49, P932, DOI 10.1007/BF03016877