Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery

被引:1360
作者
Begg, CB
Cramer, LD
Hoskins, WJ
Brennan, MF
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1998年 / 280卷 / 20期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.280.20.1747
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context.-Hospitals that treat a relatively high volume of patients for selected surgical oncology procedures report lower surgical in-hospital mortality rates than hospitals with a low volume of the procedures, but the reports do not take into account length of stay or adjust for case mix. Objective.-To determine whether hospital volume was inversely associated with 30-day operative mortality, after adjusting for case mix. Design and Setting.-Retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database in which the hypothesis was prospectively specified. Surgeons determined in advance the surgical oncology procedures for which the experience of treating a larger volume of patients was most likely to lead to the knowledge or technical expertise that might offset surgical fatalities. Patients.-All 5013 patients in the SEER registry aged 65 years or older at cancer diagnosis who underwent pancreatectomy, esophagectomy, pneumonectomy, liver resection, or pelvic exenteration, using incident cancers of the pancreas, esophagus, lung, colon, and rectum, and various genitourinary cancers diagnosed between 1984 and 1993. Main Outcome Measure.-Thirty-day mortality in relation to procedure volume, adjusted for comorbidity, patient age, and cancer stage. Results.-Higher volume was linked with lower mortality for pancreatectomy (P=.004), esophagectomy (P<.001), liver resection (P=.04), and pelvic exenteration (P=.04), but not for pneumonectomy (P=.32). The most striking results were for esophagectomy, for which the operative mortality rose to 17.3% in low-volume hospitals, compared with 3.4% in high-volume hospitals, and for pancreatectomy, for which the corresponding rates were 12.9% vs 5.8%. Adjustments for case mix and other patient factors did not change the finding that low volume was strongly associated with excess mortality. Conclusions.-These data support the hypothesis that when complex surgical oncologic procedures are provided by surgical teams in hospitals with specialty expertise, mortality rates are lower.
引用
收藏
页码:1747 / 1751
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   FACTORS INFLUENCING SURVIVAL AFTER TOTAL PANCREATECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PANCREATIC-CANCER [J].
ANDRENSANDBERG, A ;
IHSE, I .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1983, 198 (05) :605-610
[2]  
ARMITAGE P, 1994, STAT METHODS MED RES, P464
[3]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[4]   Should Hepatic Resections Be Performed at High-Volume Referral Centers? [J].
Choti M.A. ;
Bowman H.M. ;
Pitt H.A. ;
Sosa J.A. ;
Sitzmann J.V. ;
Cameron J.L. ;
Gordon T.A. .
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 1998, 2 (1) :11-20
[5]  
EDGE SB, 1993, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V71, P3502, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930601)71:11<3502::AID-CNCR2820711107>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-N
[7]   Searching for an improved clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data [J].
Ghali, WA ;
Hall, RE ;
Rosen, AK ;
Ash, AS ;
Moskowitz, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 49 (03) :273-278
[8]   Survival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: A study of 3786 patients in the west of Scotland [J].
Gillis, CR ;
Hole, DJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7024) :145-148
[9]  
Glasgow RE, 1996, WESTERN J MED, V165, P294
[10]   THE EFFECTS OF REGIONALIZATION ON COST AND OUTCOME FOR ONE GENERAL HIGH-RISK SURGICAL-PROCEDURE [J].
GORDON, TA ;
BURLEYSON, GP ;
TIELSCH, JM ;
CAMERON, JL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 221 (01) :43-49