Is ISO 14001 a gateway to more advanced voluntary action? The case of green supply chain management

被引:157
作者
Arimura, Toshi H. [1 ,2 ]
Darnall, Nicole [3 ]
Katayama, Hajime [4 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Tokyo 1028554, Japan
[2] Sophia Univ, Tokyo 1028554, Japan
[3] George Mason Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[4] Univ Sydney, Fac Econ & Business, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Voluntary actions; Positive spillover; Environmental management systems; ISO; 14001; Green supply chain management; Government assistance programs; Environmental impacts; Discrete choice model; Endogeneity; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; ISO-14001; CERTIFICATION; FIRMS; ADOPTION; SYSTEMS; MODELS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeem.2010.11.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using Japanese facility-level data, we estimate the effects of ISO 14001 certification on the promotion of more advanced practices, namely green supply chain management (GSCM). Our results show that ISO 14001 promotes GSCM practices. Facilities with environmental management systems (EMS) certified to ISO 14001 are 40% more likely to assess their suppliers' environmental performance and 50% more likely to require that their suppliers undertake specific environmental practices. Further, government programs that encourage voluntary EMS adoption indirectly promote GSCM practices. These programs increase the probabilities that facilities will assess their suppliers' environmental performance and require suppliers to undertake specific environmental practices by 7% and 8%, respectively. Combined, these findings suggest that there may be significant but previously unnoticed spillover effects of ISO 14001 and government promotion of voluntary action. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 182
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ENV POLICY CORPORATE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, DOI DOI 10.1002/BSE.435
[4]   Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance [J].
Anton, WRQ ;
Deltas, G ;
Khanna, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 48 (01) :632-654
[5]   Is a voluntary approach an effective environmental policy instrument? A case for environmental management systems [J].
Arimura, Toshi H. ;
Hibiki, Akira ;
Katayama, Hajime .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 55 (03) :281-295
[7]  
Coglianese C., 2001, Regulating from the Inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals?
[8]  
Cox A., 1999, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V4, P167, DOI DOI 10.1108/13598549910284480
[9]   Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: The role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure [J].
Darnall, N ;
Edwards, D .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (04) :301-320
[10]  
Darnall N., 2008, Business Strategy and The Environment, V17, P30, DOI DOI 10.1002/BSE.557