The Manhattan metaphor

被引:65
作者
Peretto, Pietro F. [1 ]
Connolly, Michelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Econ, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
endogenous growth; fixed costs; technological change; innovation; population growth;
D O I
10.1007/s10887-007-9023-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Fixed operating costs draw a sharp distinction between endogenous growth based on horizontal and vertical innovation: a larger number of product lines puts pressure on an economy's resources; greater productivity of existing product lines does not. Consequently, the only plausible engine of endogenous growth is vertical innovation whereby progress along the quality or cost ladder does not require the replication of fixed costs. Is, then, product variety expansion irrelevant? No. The two dimensions of technology are complementary in that using one and the other produces a more comprehensive theory of economic growth. The vertical dimension allows endogenous growth unconstrained by endowments, the horizontal provides the mechanism that translates changes in aggregate variables into changes in product-level variables, which ultimately drive incentives to push the technological frontier in the vertical dimension. We show that the potential for exponential growth due to an externality that makes entry costs fall linearly with the number of products, combined with the limited carrying capacity of the system due to fixed operating costs, yields logistic dynamics for the number of products. This desirable property allows us to provide a closed-form solution for the model's transition path and thereby derive analytically the welfare effects of changes in parameters and policy variables. Our Manhattan Metaphor illustrates conceptually why we obtain this mathematical representation when we simply add fixed operating costs to the standard modeling of variety expansion.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 350
页数:22
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Aghion P., 1998, ENDOGENOUS GROWTH TH
[2]  
Banks R., 1994, Growth and Diffusion Phenomena: Mathematical Frameworks and Applications
[3]  
Barro R. J., 2003, Economic growth, V2nd
[4]   Industry and the family: Two engines of growth [J].
Connolly, M ;
Peretto, PF .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2003, 8 (01) :115-148
[5]  
COZZI G, 2002, UNPUB QUASI FIXED CO
[6]  
ETRO F, 2004, ECON J, V114, P281, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0297.2004.00210.X
[7]  
Grossman GM., 1991, Innovation and growth in the global economy
[8]   Accounting for trends in productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian critique of semi-endogenous growth theory [J].
Ha, Joonkyung ;
Howitt, Peter .
JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 2007, 39 (04) :733-774
[9]   Steady endogenous growth with population and R & D inputs growing [J].
Howitt, P .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1999, 107 (04) :715-730
[10]   Scale effects in endogenous growth theory: an error of aggregation not specification [J].
Laincz, Christopher A. ;
Peretto, Pietro F. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2006, 11 (03) :263-288