Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: A new research agenda

被引:265
作者
Bai, Xuemei [1 ]
van der Leeuw, Sander [2 ]
O'Brien, Karen [3 ]
Berkhout, Frans [4 ]
Biermann, Frank [5 ]
Brondizio, Eduardo S. [6 ,7 ]
Cudennec, Christophe [8 ]
Dearing, John [9 ]
Duraiappah, Anantha [10 ]
Glaser, Marion [11 ]
Revkin, Andrew [12 ]
Steffen, Will [13 ,14 ]
Syvitski, James [15 ,16 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Frank Fenner Bldg, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] Arizona State Univ, ASU SFI Ctr Biosocial Complex Syst, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Univ Oslo, Dept Sociol 8 Human Geog, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[4] Kings Coll London, Dept Geog, London, England
[5] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Indiana Univ, Anthropol Ctr Training & Res Global Environm Chan, Dept Anthropol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[7] Indiana Univ, Vincent & Elinor Ostrom Workshop Polit Theory & P, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[8] Agrocampus Ouest, INRA, SAS UMR1069, Rennes, France
[9] Univ Southampton, Geog & Environm, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
[10] UNESCO Mahatma Gandhi Inst Educ Peace & Sustainab, Delhi, India
[11] Leibniz Ctr Trop Marine Ecol ZMT, Bremen, Germany
[12] Pace Univ, Pace Acad Appl Environm Studies, New York, NY USA
[13] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[14] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[15] Univ Colorado, Community Surface Dynam Modeling Syst, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[16] Royal Swedish Acad Sci, Int Geosphere Biosphere Programme, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2016年 / 39卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Anthropocene; Plausible and desirable futures; Societal goals; Societal trend and dynamics; Transition and transformation; Changing role of science; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SUSTAINABILITY; SYSTEMS; PERSPECTIVE; ENVIRONMENT; RESILIENCE; MISMATCHES; FRAMEWORK; PLANETARY; PATHWAYS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.017
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While the concept of the Anthropocene reflects the past and present nature, scale and magnitude of human impacts on the Earth System, its true significance lies in how it can be used to guide attitudes, choices, policies and actions that influence the future. Yet, to date much of the research on the Anthropocene has focused on interpreting past and present changes, while saying little about the future. Likewise, many futures studies have been insufficiently rooted in an understanding of past changes, in particular the long-term co-evolution of bio-physical and human systems. The Anthropocene perspective is one that encapsulates a world of intertwined drivers, complex dynamic structures, emergent phenomena and unintended consequences, manifest across different scales and within interlinked biophysical constraints and social conditions. In this paper we discuss the changing role of science and the theoretical, methodological and analytical challenges in considering futures of the Anthropocene. We present three broad groups of research questions on: (1) societal goals for the future; (2) major trends and dynamics that might favor or hinder them; (3) and factors that might propel or impede transformations towards desirable futures. Tackling these questions requires the development of novel approaches integrating natural and social sciences as well as the humanities beyond what is current today. We present three examples, one from each group of questions, illustrating how science might contribute to the identification of desirable and plausible futures and pave the way for transformations towards them. We argue that it is time for debates on the sustainability of the Anthropocene to focus on opportunities for realizing desirable and plausible futures. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 362
页数:12
相关论文
共 133 条
[1]  
Agarwala M, 2012, INCLUSIVE WEALTH REP
[2]  
ALLEN M.R., 2014, IPCC 5 ASSESSMENT SY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being: Desertification synthesis
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently and Why
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1972, The Limits to Growth
[6]  
A Global Challenge
[7]   Are we consuming too much? [J].
Arrow, K ;
Dasgupta, P ;
Goulder, L ;
Daily, G ;
Ehrlich, P ;
Heal, G ;
Levin, S ;
Mäler, KG ;
Schneider, S ;
Starrett, D ;
Walker, B .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2004, 18 (03) :147-172
[8]   Sustainability and the measurement of wealth [J].
Arrow, Kenneth J. ;
Dasgupta, Partha ;
Goulder, Lawrence H. ;
Mumford, Kevin J. ;
Oleson, Kirsten .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2012, 17 :317-353
[9]  
Arthur W., 2009, The Nature of Technology: What it Is and How it Evolves, DOI DOI 10.20396/RBI.V8I2.8648990
[10]   Realizing China's urban dream [J].
Bai, Xuemei ;
Shi, Peijun ;
Liu, Yansui .
NATURE, 2014, 509 (7499) :158-160