Multi-criteria decision support and evaluation of strategies for nuclear remediation management

被引:74
作者
Geldermann, Jutta [1 ]
Bertsch, Valentin [1 ]
Treitz, Martin [1 ]
French, Simon [2 ]
Papamichail, Konstantinia N. [2 ]
Hamalainen, Raimo P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Karlsruhe TH, Inst Ind Prod, D-76187 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester Business Sch, Manchester M15 6PB, Lancs, England
[3] Aalto Univ, Syst Anal Lab, FIN-02150 Espoo, Finland
来源
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE | 2009年 / 37卷 / 01期
关键词
decision support systems; emergency and remediation management; multi-critcria evaluation; stakeholder involvement; natural language generation; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS; WEB-HIPRE; SYSTEM; EXPLANATIONS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2006.11.006
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Environmental emergency situations can differ in many ways, for instance according to their causes and the dimension of their impacts. Yet, they share the characteristic of sudden onset and the necessity for a coherent and effective emergency management. In this paper we consider decision support in the event of a nuclear or radiological accident in Europe. RODOS, an acronym for real-time on-line decision Support system, is a decision support system designed to provide support from the early phases through to the medium and long-term phases. This work highlights the role of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) within RODOS in ensuring the transparency of decision processes within emergency and remediation management. Special emphasis is placed on the evaluation of alternative remediation or countermeasure strategies using the multi-criteria decision support tool Web-HIPRE in scenario focused decision making workshops involving different stakeholder and expert groups. Decision support is enhanced by a module that generates natural language explanations to facilitate the understanding of the evaluation process, therefore contributing to the direct involvement of the decision makers, with the aim of increasing their confidence in the results of the analyses carried out, forming an audit trail for the decision making process and improving the acceptability of the system as a whole. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 251
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1969, Sensitivitatsanalysen und Parametrische Programmierung
[2]   Decision quality using ranked attribute weights [J].
Barron, FH ;
Barrett, BE .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1996, 42 (11) :1515-1523
[3]  
Belton V., 2002, MULIPLE CRITERIA DEC
[4]  
Bertsch V., 2005, INT C MON ASS UNC NU
[5]  
Bertsch V., 2006, P 9 IFAC S AUT SYST
[6]  
BERTSCH V, 2005, TIEMS 12 ANN C FAR I
[7]  
CARTER E, 2005, THESIS U MANCHESTER
[8]  
Clemen R., 1996, MAKING HARD DECISION
[9]   The use and effects of knowledge-based system explanations: Theoretical foundations and a framework for empirical evaluation [J].
Dhaliwal, JS ;
Benbasat, I .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1996, 7 (03) :342-362
[10]   DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS AND MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING [J].
DOYLE, J ;
GREEN, R .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1993, 21 (06) :713-715