Why not a political Coase theorem? Social conflict, commitment, and politics

被引:300
作者
Acemoglu, D [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
关键词
political economy; institutions; commitment; social conflict; belief differences; appropriate institutions; economic development; colonialism;
D O I
10.1016/j.jce.2003.09.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Acemoglu, Daron-Why not a political Coase theorem? Social conflict, commitment, and politics Do societies choose inefficient policies and institutions? An extension of the Coase theorem to politics would suggest the answer is no. This paper discusses various approaches to political economy and develops the argument that there are strong empirical and theoretical grounds for believing that inefficient policies and institutions are prevalent. We conclude that these inefficient institutions and policies are chosen because they serve the interests of politicians or social groups that hold political power at the expense of the rest. The theoretical case depends on commitment problems inherent in politics; parties holding political power cannot make commitments to bind their future actions because there is no outside agency with the coercive capacity to enforce such arrangements. (C) 2003 Association for Comparative Economic Studies. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 652
页数:33
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Why did the west extend the franchise? Democracy, inequality, and growth in historical perspective [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Robinson, JA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2000, 115 (04) :1167-1199
[2]   The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Johnson, S ;
Robinson, JA .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (05) :1369-1401
[3]   Property rights, corruption and the allocation of talent: A general equilibrium approach [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Verdier, T .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1998, 108 (450) :1381-1403
[4]   Inefficient redistribution [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Robinson, JA .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2001, 95 (03) :649-661
[5]   Political losers as a barrier to economic development [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Robinson, JA .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (02) :126-130
[6]  
ACEMOGLU D, 2002, NBER WORKING PAPER, V9066
[7]  
ACEMOGLU D, 2002, NBER WORKING PAPER, V8831
[8]  
ACEMOGLU D, 2003, UNPUB STATE POWER EC
[9]   A DOWNSIAN SPATIAL MODEL WITH PARTY ACTIVISM [J].
ALDRICH, JH .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1983, 77 (04) :974-990
[10]  
ANDERLINI L, 1998, TE98362 LSE