The current use and future trends of focal surgical therapy in the management of localized prostate cancer

被引:24
作者
Barqawi, Al B. [1 ]
Crawford, E. David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Med, Urol Oncol Dept, Denver, CO 80262 USA
关键词
prostate cancer; minimally invasive treatment; localized disease;
D O I
10.1097/PPO.0b013e318156eb99
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The current treatment algorithms for management of localized prostate cancer are mainly extirpative in nature. Treatment varies from expectant management to radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. However, the ever-increasing emphasis on achieving the best survival benefit while better preserving quality of life, coupled with the introduction of new, safer, and efficacious minimally invasive ablative technologies, has led to the increased popularity of minimally invasive treatment (MIT). MIT refers to the use of a wide range of techniques for local target ablation of the prostate gland with minimal damage to the surrounding tissue. Currently these include cryotherapy and high-intensity focused ultrasound. However, other experimental technologies such as photodynamic therapy, interstitial prostate brachytherapy, and microwave and radiofrequency interstitial tumor ablation are also currently under investigation in early clinical trials. To date, the overall interim results for these relatively new modalities of treatment appear comparable to those for surgical and radiation therapies. However, randomized, controlled studies are needed to support use of these modalities as an alternative to surgery and radiation. In this review, we will address the current rationale for and knowledge of MIT with regard to its safety and efficacy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. In addition, we will discuss future promising tools in MIT such as photodynamic therapy and the target focal therapy approach as a new trend for the treatment of organ-confined low-volume disease.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 317
页数:5
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Comparison of health-related quality of life and prostate-associated symptoms after primary and salvage cryotherapy for prostate cancer [J].
Anastasiadis, AG ;
Sachdev, R ;
Salomon, L ;
Ghafar, MA ;
Stisser, BC ;
Shabsigh, R ;
Katz, AE .
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 129 (12) :676-682
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Guideline for the Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: 2007 Update
[3]  
AUS G, 2006, EUR UROL, P934
[4]   Current status of HIFU and cryotherapy in prostate cancer - A review [J].
Aus, Gunnar .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (05) :927-934
[5]   Targeted cryoablation of the prostate: 7-year outcomes in the primary treatment of prostate cancer [J].
Bahn, DK ;
Lee, F ;
Badalament, R ;
Kumar, A ;
Greski, J ;
Chernick, M .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (2A) :3-11
[6]   Cryosurgery - a putative approach to molecular-based optimization [J].
Baust, JG ;
Gage, AA ;
Clarke, D ;
Baust, JM ;
Van Buskirk, R .
CRYOBIOLOGY, 2004, 48 (02) :190-204
[7]   Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound using the ablatherm device in the treatment of localized prostate carcinoma [J].
Beerlage, HP ;
Thuroff, S ;
Debruyne, FMJ ;
Chaussy, C ;
de la Rosette, JJMCH .
UROLOGY, 1999, 54 (02) :273-277
[8]   Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer [J].
Bill-Axelson, A ;
Holmberg, L ;
Ruutu, M ;
Häggman, M ;
Andersson, SO ;
Bratell, S ;
Spångberg, A ;
Busch, C ;
Nordling, S ;
Garmo, H ;
Palmgren, J ;
Adami, HO ;
Norlén, BJ ;
Johansson, JE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (19) :1977-1984
[9]   Modeling of high-intensity focused ultrasound-induced lesions in the presence of cavitation bubbles [J].
Chavrier, F ;
Chapelon, JY ;
Gelet, A ;
Cathignol, D .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2000, 108 (01) :432-440
[10]  
Crawford ED, 2007, ONCOLOGY-NY, V21, P27