Knowledge reuse for innovation

被引:335
作者
Majchrzak, A [1 ]
Cooper, LP
Neece, OE
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Dept Informat & Operat Management, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
[3] Claremont Grad Sch, Claremont, CA 91711 USA
关键词
knowledge management; knowledge transfer; innovation;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1030.0116
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study was conducted to better understand the knowledge reuse process when radical innovation (e.g., experiments to prepare for human exploration of Mars) is expected. The research involved detailing the knowledge reuse process in six case studies varying in degree of innovation. Across the six cases, a six-stage reuse-for-innovation process was identified consisting of three major actions: reconceptualize the problem and approach, including deciding to search for others' ideas to reuse; search-and-evaluate others' ideas to reuse; and develop the selected idea. Findings include (1) the need for an insurmountable gap in performance to stimulate the decision to reuse others' knowledge; (2) the critical importance of an adapter to bridge the idea source and recipient; (3) three layers of search-and-evaluate activities in which the first layer of scanning to find ideas to reuse and the last layer of detailed analysis of ideas are bridged by a layer of brief evaluations of ideas assessing the presence (or absence) of targeted information about each idea; and (4) the differential use of metaknowledge about each idea to facilitate proceeding through each search-and-evaluate layer. In addition, reusers in the more (versus less) innovative cases redefined problems at the outset in nontraditional ways using analogies and extensions, rather than accepting the preexisting problem definition; used a substantially broader search strategy with a greater variety of search methods; and worked more closely with adapters during the latter stages of the reuse process.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 188
页数:15
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Review:: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems:: Conceptual foundations and research issues [J].
Alavi, M ;
Leidner, DE .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2001, 25 (01) :107-136
[2]  
Allen T. J., 1977, Managing the Flow of Technology -Technological Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within R
[3]  
Amabile T. M, 1996, CREATIVITY CONTEXT
[4]   How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry [J].
Appleyard, MM .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 17 :137-154
[5]   Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms [J].
Argote, L ;
Ingram, P .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2000, 82 (01) :150-169
[6]  
Argote Linda., 2012, ORG LEARNING CREATIN, V2nd
[7]   Knowledge management in research and development [J].
Armbrecht, FMR ;
Chapas, RB ;
Chappelow, CC ;
Farris, GF ;
Friga, PN ;
Hartz, CA ;
McIlvaine, ME ;
Postle, SR ;
Whitwell, GE .
RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2001, 44 (04) :28-48
[8]  
Becerra-Fernandez I, 2001, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V18, P23
[9]   Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation [J].
Blackler, F .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 1995, 16 (06) :1021-1046
[10]   ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND COMMUNITIES-OF-PRACTICE: TOWARD A UNIFIED VIEW OF WORKING, LEARNING, AND INNOVATION [J].
Brown, John Seely ;
Duguid, Paul .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1991, 2 (01) :40-57