Targeted poverty investments and economic growth in China

被引:49
作者
Rozelle, S [1 ]
Park, A
Benziger, V
Ren, CQ
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Chinese Acad Social Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
China; anti-poverty policy; rural poverty; regional differences;
D O I
10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00104-1
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In the mid-1980s, the Chinese government launched its ambitious poor area development policy, which was centered around a series of grant, credit, and Food-for-Work programs. Ironically, for the remainder of the 1980s rural poverty remained at about 90 to 100 million, or approximately 10% of the rural population. The lack of progress cannot necessarily be blamed on ineffective poor area policies, since much of the agricultural economy was mired in a deep recession between the mid-1980s and the early 1990s. By the mid-1990s substantial additional poverty reduction had been achieved. Even in the late-1980s, farmers in many poor counties did better than the national average in terms of income growth. After accounting for the effects of macroeconomic elements, what factors can help explain the differences in performance among poor regions and between poor areas and rich ones? Can part of these differences be accounted for by poor area policies,. in general, or by the way local and regional officials allocate their poor area investment funds, in particular? The overall objective of this paper is to analyze the effectiveness of Chinese poor area policy. Specifically, the paper seeks to meet three objectives. First, we want to understand the evolution of poor area policy since the mid-1980s, trying to deduce the true goals of central and regional poor area officials, as well as how these policies have been implemented in the provinces. Next, we want to understand the magnitude and scope of investment into poor areas, and examine if changes in these policies have affected the uses of the investment funds. Finally, we want to determine the effectiveness of the investment of poor area funds, analyzing which types of investments have generated growth, and which ones have not. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2137 / 2151
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   EQUILIBRIUM CREDIT RATIONING OF SMALL FARM AGRICULTURE [J].
CARTER, MR .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 1988, 28 (01) :83-103
[2]  
CHEN J, 1991, PINKUN DIQU JINGJI K, P96
[3]  
DU X, 1994, PROMOTING EC DEV CHI
[4]  
FAN P, 1994, PROMOTING EC DEV CHI
[5]  
HUANG J, 1996, PUBLIC INVESTMENT TE
[6]   Technological change: Rediscovering the engine of productivity growth in China's rural economy [J].
Huang, JK ;
Rozelle, S .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 1996, 49 (02) :337-369
[7]  
JYATNA J, 1997, 1695 WORLD BANK
[8]  
KHAN A, 1998, 1998 ALL SOC SCI ASS
[9]  
LARDY N, 1988, AGR CHINAS MODERN EC
[10]  
LI J, 1992, USE POVERTY ALLEVIAT