Economic integration and political disintegration

被引:290
作者
Alesina, A [1 ]
Spolaore, E
Wacziarg, R
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Econ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Ctr Econ Policy Res, Bozeman, MT USA
[4] Brown Univ, Dept Econ, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1257/aer.90.5.1276
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In a world of trade restrictions, large countries enjoy economic benefits, because political boundaries determine the size of the market. Under free trade and global markets even relatively small cultural, linguistic or ethnic groups can benefit from forming small, homogeneous political jurisdictions. This paper provides a formal model of the relationship between openness and the equilibrium number and size of countries, and successfully tests two implications of the model. Firstly, the economic benefits of country size are mediated by the degree of openness to trade. Secondly, the history of nation-state creations and secessions is influenced by the trade regime.
引用
收藏
页码:1276 / 1296
页数:21
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Evidence on growth, increasing returns, and the extent of the market [J].
Ades, AF ;
Glaeser, EL .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1999, 114 (03) :1025-1045
[2]   Is Europe going too far? [J].
Alesina, A ;
Wacziarg, R .
CARNEGIE-ROCHESTER CONFERENCE SERIES ON PUBLIC POLICY, VOL 51, DECEMBER 1999, 1999, 51 :1-42
[3]   Openness, country size and government [J].
Alesina, A ;
Wacziarg, R .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1998, 69 (03) :305-321
[4]   On the number and size of nations [J].
Alesina, A ;
Spolaore, E .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (04) :1027-1056
[5]  
ALESINA A, 1997, 6163 NAT BUR EC RES
[6]  
[Anonymous], BROOKINGS PAPERS EC
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1998, MUCH NATL BORDERS MA
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2001 WORLD BANK
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1987, The Age of Empire
[10]  
Barro R., 1995, EC GROWTH