Decentralizing antipoverty program delivery in developing countries

被引:155
作者
Bardhan, P
Mookherjee, D
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Dept Econ, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Econ, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
bureaucracy; corruption; decentralization; poverty alleviation; targeting;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpubcco.2003.01.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We study the effects on accountability in government service delivery of decentralizing administration of an antipoverty program. While governments at both central and local levels are vulnerable to antipoor policy biases owing to political capture, centralized delivery systems are additionally prone to bureaucratic corruption, owing to problems in monitoring bureaucratic performance. Decentralizing the delivery system promotes cost-effectiveness and improves intraregional targeting at low program scales. But interregional targeting may deteriorate, as central grants to high-poverty regions shrink, owing to high capture of local governments by local elites in such regions. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 704
页数:30
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
ALLINGHAM MG, 1991, J PUBLIC ECON, V1, P50
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1937, FEDERALIST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, GOOD GOVT TROPICS
[4]  
[Anonymous], ASIAN SURVEY
[5]   A theory of misgovernance [J].
Banerjee, AV .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (04) :1289-1332
[6]   Capture and governance at local and national levels [J].
Bardhan, P ;
Mookherjee, D .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (02) :135-139
[7]  
Bardhan P., 1999, RELATIVE CAPTURE LOC
[8]   ELECTORAL COMPETITION WITH INFORMED AND UNINFORMED VOTERS [J].
BARON, DP .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1994, 88 (01) :33-47
[9]  
BESLEY T, 1999, 7084 NAT BUR EC RES
[10]  
CONNIG J, 1999, UNPUB COMMUNITY BASE