Polygenic inheritance of breast cancer: Implications for design of association studies

被引:182
作者
Antoniou, AC [1 ]
Easton, DF [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Strangeways Res Lab, Genet Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge CB1 8RN, England
关键词
case-control studies; familial cases; unrelated controls; sample size;
D O I
10.1002/gepi.10261
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Susceptibility to breast cancer is likely to be the result of susceptibility alleles in many different genes. In particular, one segregation analysis of breast cancer suggested that disease susceptibility in noncarriers of BRCA1/2 mutations may be explicable in terms of a polygenic model, with large numbers of susceptibility polymorphisms acting multiplicatively on risk. We considered the implications for such a model on the design of association studies to detect susceptibility polymorphisms, in particular the efficacy of utilizing cases with a family history of the disease, together with unrelated controls. Relative to a standard case-control association study with cases unselected for family history, the sample size required to detect a common disease susceptibility allele was typically reduced by more than twofold if cases with an affected first-degree relative were selected, and by more than fourfold if cases with two affected first-degree relatives were utilized. The relative efficiency obtained by using familial cases was greater for rarer alleles. Analysis of extended families indicated that the power was most dependent on the immediate (first-degree) family history. Bilateral cases may offer a similar gain in power to cases with two affected first-degree relatives. In contrast to the strong effect of family history, varying the ages at diagnosis of the cases across the range of 35-65 years did not strongly affect the power to detect association. These results indicate that association studies based on cases with a strong family history, identified for example through cancer genetics clinics, may be substantially more efficient than population-based studies. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 202
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   A comprehensive model for familial breast cancer incorporating BRCA1, BRCA2 and other genes [J].
Antoniou, AC ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
McMullan, G ;
Day, NE ;
Stratton, MR ;
Peto, J ;
Ponder, BJ ;
Easton, DF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 86 (01) :76-83
[2]   Evidence for further breast cancer susceptibility genes in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a population-based study [J].
Antoniou, AC ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
McMullan, G ;
Day, NE ;
Ponder, BAJ ;
Easton, D .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 21 (01) :1-18
[3]   TESTS FOR LINEAR TRENDS IN PROPORTIONS AND FREQUENCIES [J].
ARMITAGE, P .
BIOMETRICS, 1955, 11 (03) :375-386
[4]   Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58 209 women with breast cancer and 101 986 women without the disease [J].
Beral, V ;
Bull, D ;
Doll, R ;
Peto, R ;
Reeves, G .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9291) :1389-1399
[5]   After BRCA1 and BRCA2-what next? Multifactorial segregation analyses of three-generation, population-based Australian families affected by female breast cancer [J].
Cui, JS ;
Antoniou, AC ;
Dite, GS ;
Southey, MC ;
Venter, DJ ;
Easton, DF ;
Giles, GG ;
McCredie, MRE ;
Hopper, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2001, 68 (02) :420-431
[6]  
Dunning AM, 1999, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V8, P843
[7]   How many more breast cancer predisposition genes are there? [J].
Douglas F Easton .
Breast Cancer Research, 1 (1)
[8]  
Gauderman W. James, 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, P31
[9]   A common variant in BRCA2 is associated with both breast cancer risk and prenatal viability [J].
Healey, CS ;
Dunning, AM ;
Teare, MD ;
Chase, D ;
Parker, L ;
Burn, J ;
Chang-Claude, J ;
Mannermaa, A ;
Kataja, V ;
Huntsman, DG ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
Luben, RN ;
Easton, DF ;
Ponder, BAJ .
NATURE GENETICS, 2000, 26 (03) :362-364
[10]   Variants in DNA double-strand break repair genes and breast cancer susceptibility [J].
Kuschel, B ;
Auranen, A ;
McBride, S ;
Novik, KL ;
Antoniou, A ;
Lipscombe, JM ;
Day, NE ;
Easton, DF ;
Ponder, BAJ ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
Dunning, A .
HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2002, 11 (12) :1399-1407