Changing computer use in agriculture: evidence from Ohio

被引:40
作者
Batte, MT [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Agr Environm & Dev Econ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
computer adoption; computer usefulness; probit results;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2004.08.002
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Farmers are continuing to expand their use of computers. This article reports analyses for a 2003 random sample of Ohio, USA farmers. Computer adoption by Ohio farmers currently stands at 44%, up from 32% in 1991. Financial accounting remains the most often used task of farm computers, with 89% of farmers reporting such usage. However, the use of the Internet for communication, for transactions processing, or for information retrieval more broadly, is an application that was largely unavailable in 1991, and which is now used by about 80% of the farmers sampled. A binomial Probit model was formulated to determine those farm and farmer characteristics that influence farmers' decisions to adopt an office computer. Likelihood of computer adoption was found to increase with increased farm size (annual sales) and higher operator education. Younger farmers were significantly more like to adopt the computer. Adoption percent was higher on farms that were more reliant on leased land, and was lower for livestock farmers. Farmers who worked year-around away from the farm were more likely to adopt a computer for the farm business. A second binomial Probit model was formulated to identify those farmer characteristics associated with higher manager evaluations of the computer as a management tool. Likelihood of above average computer usefulness evaluations rose with increased farm annual gross sales, diminished with increased age of the operator, and were higher for farmers who used the computer foe financial or production recordkeeping or who gathered information from the Internet. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
ALDRICH JH, 1984, SAGE U PAPER SERIES, P7
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1962, DIFFUSION INNOVATION
[3]  
Batte M. T., 1993, Size, structure, and the changing face of American agriculture., P308
[4]   COMPUTER USE BY OHIO COMMERCIAL FARMERS [J].
BATTE, MT ;
JONES, E ;
SCHNITKEY, GD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1990, 72 (04) :935-945
[5]  
BATTE MT, 1995, N CENTRAL REGIONAL R, V339
[6]  
Ferrer S. R. D., 2003, 41 ANN C AGR EC ASS
[7]  
GREENE WH, 1998, LIMDEP VERSION 7 0 U
[8]   Case studies of the interactions between farm profitability and the use of a farm computer [J].
Nuthall, PL .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2004, 42 (01) :19-30
[9]  
Park T., 2003, AM AGR EC ASS ANN M
[10]   COMPUTER USE IN AGRICULTURE - EVIDENCE FROM TULARE-COUNTY, CALIFORNIA [J].
PUTLER, DS ;
ZILBERMAN, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1988, 70 (04) :790-802