Political constraints on executive compensation: Evidence from the electric utility industry

被引:56
作者
Joskow, PL [1 ]
Rose, NL [1 ]
Wolfram, CD [1 ]
机构
[1] NATL BUR ECON RES,CAMBRIDGE,MA 02138
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2555797
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study explores the effect of regulatory and political constraints on the level of CEO compensation for 87 state-regulated electric utilities during 1978-1990. The results suggest that political pressures may constrain Top executive pay levels in this industry. First, CEOs of firms operating in regulatory environments characterized by investment banks as relatively ''preconsumer'' receive lower compensation than do CEOs of firms in environments ranked as more friendly to investors. Second, CEO pay is lower for utilities with relatively high or rising rates, or a higher proportion of industrial customers. Finally, attributes of the commission appointment and tenure rules affect CEO compensation in ways consistent with the political constraint hypothesis.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 182
页数:18
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Anderson Douglas, 1980, POLITICS REGULATION
[2]  
[Anonymous], COST TALENT
[3]   THE EFFECTS OF REGULATION ON EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION [J].
CARROLL, TM ;
CISCEL, DH .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1982, 64 (03) :505-509
[4]  
Costello Kenneth W., 1984, Yale Journal on Regulation, V83, P83
[5]  
CRYSTAL GS, 1991, SEARCH EXCESS
[6]   SOME DETERMINANTS OF ALLOWED RATES OF RETURN ON EQUITY TO ELECTRIC UTILITIES [J].
HAGERMAN, RL ;
RATCHFORD, BT .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1978, 9 (01) :46-55
[7]   RISK-AVERSION, PERFORMANCE PAY, AND THE PRINCIPAL-AGENT PROBLEM [J].
HAUBRICH, JG .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1994, 102 (02) :258-276
[8]   SPECIFICATION TESTS IN ECONOMETRICS [J].
HAUSMAN, JA .
ECONOMETRICA, 1978, 46 (06) :1251-1271
[9]   EFFECT OF REGULATION ON COLLECTIVE-BARGAINING IN ELECTRIC UTILITIES [J].
HENDRICKS, W .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1975, 6 (02) :451-465
[10]   PERFORMANCE PAY AND TOP-MANAGEMENT INCENTIVES [J].
JENSEN, MC ;
MURPHY, KJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1990, 98 (02) :225-264