Sampling large Internet topologies for simulation purposes

被引:37
作者
Krishnamurthy, Vaishnavi
Faloutsos, Michalis [1 ]
Chrobak, Marek
Cui, Jun-Hong
Lao, Li
Percus, Allon G.
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Storrs, CT USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[4] Los Alamos Natl Labs, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
graph modeling; graph sampling; graph properties;
D O I
10.1016/j.comnet.2007.06.004
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, we develop methods to "sample" a small realistic graph from a large Internet topology. Despite recent activity, modeling and generation of realistic graphs resembling the Internet is still not a resolved issue. All previous work has attempted to grow such graphs from scratch. We address the complementary problem of shrinking an existing topology. In more detail, this work has three parts. First, we propose a number of reduction methods that can be categorized into three classes: (a) deletion methods, (b) contraction methods, and (c) exploration methods. We prove that some of them maintain key properties of the initial graph. We implement our methods and show that we can effectively reduce the nodes of an Internet graph by as much as 70% while maintaining its important properties. Second, we show that our reduced graphs compare favorably against construction-based generators. Finally, we successfully validate the effectiveness of our best methods in an actual performance evaluation study of multicast routing. Apart from its practical applications, the problem of graph sampling is of independent interest. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4284 / 4302
页数:19
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Statistical mechanics of complex networks [J].
Albert, R ;
Barabási, AL .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2002, 74 (01) :47-97
[2]  
[Anonymous], MASCOTS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, RANDOM GRAPH MODEL M
[4]  
BALLARDIE A, 1993, ACM SIGCOMM
[5]  
BALLARDIE A, 1997, MULTICAST BORDER ROU
[6]  
BARABASI A, 1999, EMERGENCE SCALING RA, V8
[7]  
BATTISTA G, 2003, COMPUTING TYPES RELA
[8]   Performance and resource cost comparisons for the CBT and PIM multicast routing protocols [J].
Billhartz, T ;
Cain, JB ;
FarreyGoudreau, E ;
Fieg, D ;
Batsell, SG .
IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, 1997, 15 (03) :304-315
[9]  
Bu T., 2002, INFOCOM
[10]   Modeling Internet topology [J].
Calvert, KL ;
Doar, MB ;
Zegura, EW .
IEEE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE, 1997, 35 (06) :160-163