The possible adverse impact of innovation subsidies: some evidence from Italy

被引:60
作者
Catozzella, Alessandra [1 ]
Vivarelli, Marco [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento Sci Econ & Sociali, Piacenza, Italy
[2] Univ Sussex, SPRU, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[3] Inst Study Labour IZA, Bonn, Germany
关键词
Innovation subsidy; Policy evaluation; Product innovation; Bivariate endogenous switching model; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; SAMPLE SELECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11365-014-0342-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The impact of public funding on innovative productivity is estimated using a sample of Italian firm-level data (CIS3). A bivariate endogenous switching model is developed in order to free the analysis of the sources of sample selection and firm heterogeneity, the possible simultaneity between subsidy allocation and the qualitative composition of the innovative output, as well as the endogeneity of public support with respect to innovative performance. Results show that innovative productivity is negatively affected by the subsidy; as a result of government intervention, supported firms appear to exhaust their advantage through merely increasing their innovative expenditures.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 368
页数:18
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010034 UNUMERIT
[2]  
Arrow K., 1962, RATE DIRECTION INVEN, P609
[3]   Are firms that receive R&D subsidies more innovative? [J].
Berube, Charles ;
Mohnen, Pierre .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2009, 42 (01) :206-225
[4]  
Blundell R., 2000, Fiscal Studies, V21, P427, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1475-5890.2000.TB00031.X, 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2000.tb00031.x, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2000.tb00031.x]
[5]  
Branstetter L, 1998, J IND ECON, V46, P207
[6]  
Busom I., 2000, ECON INNOV NEW TECH, V9, P111, DOI DOI 10.1080/10438590000000006
[7]  
Cameron AC., 2005, Microeconometrics: Methods and applications
[8]  
Capron H., 1997, OECD POLICY EVALUATI
[9]  
Cohen LindaR., 1991, TECHNOLOGY PORK BARR
[10]  
Conte A., 2014, EMPIRICAL E IN PRESS