Institutional ownership and monitoring effectiveness: It's not just how much but what else you own

被引:61
作者
Dharwadkar, Ravi [1 ]
Goranova, Maria [2 ]
Brandes, Pamela [1 ]
Khan, Raihan [3 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Management, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Org & Strateg Management, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[3] SUNY Coll Oswego, Dept Management, Oswego, NY 13126 USA
关键词
large owners; institutional investors; executive compensation;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.1080.0359
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Corporate governance research indicates that large owners provide effective monitoring. In this article, we expand firm-level notions of monitoring to include large institutional owners' investment portfolios and suggest that portfolio characteristics affect owners' motivation and capacity to monitor, which compromises the positive effects of monitoring at the firm level. Specifically, using data from 533 large firms over a 10-year period, we find that increases in the size of portfolio holdings, number of portfolio blockholdings, portfolio turnover, and the importance of a particular holding reduce monitoring effectiveness in the context of executive compensation. Overall, we provide preliminary evidence that the portfolio characteristics of the largest institutional owners contradict firm-level monitoring effects; therefore, we strongly recommend that future studies consider both firm-and portfolio-level effects simultaneously to understand monitoring effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 440
页数:22
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   LARGE SHAREHOLDERS AND THE MONITORING OF MANAGERS - THE CASE OF ANTITAKEOVER CHARTER AMENDMENTS [J].
AGRAWAL, A ;
MANDELKER, GN .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1990, 25 (02) :143-161
[2]  
Agrawal A., 1992, Managerial and Decision Economics, V13, P15, DOI 10.1002/mde.4090130103
[3]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
[4]   Active institutional shareholders and costs of monitoring: Evidence from executive compensation [J].
Almazan, A ;
Hartzell, JC ;
Starks, LT .
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 34 (04) :5-34
[5]   RISK REDUCTION AS A MANAGERIAL MOTIVE FOR CONGLOMERATE MERGERS [J].
AMIHUD, Y ;
LEV, B .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1981, 12 (02) :605-617
[6]   Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500 [J].
Anderson, RC ;
Reeb, DM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2003, 58 (03) :1301-1328
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1989, ACAD MANAGE J
[8]   MANAGERIAL INCENTIVES, MONITORING, AND RISK BEARING - A STUDY OF EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION, OWNERSHIP, AND BOARD STRUCTURE IN INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS [J].
BEATTY, RP ;
ZAJAC, EJ .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1994, 39 (02) :313-335
[9]  
Bebchuk L., 2004, Pay without Performance The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation
[10]   Managerial power and rent extraction in the design of executive compensation [J].
Bebchuk, LA ;
Fried, JM ;
Walker, DI .
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 2002, 69 (03) :751-846