The Safe Assets Shortage Conundrum

被引:147
作者
Caballero, Ricardo J. [1 ,4 ]
Farhi, Emmanuel [2 ,4 ]
Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Econ, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Econ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Econ, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
INTEREST-RATES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1257/jep.31.3.29
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A safe asset is a simple debt instrument that is expected to preserve its value during adverse systemic events. The supply of safe assets, private and public, has historically been concentrated in a small number of advanced economies, most prominently the United States. Over the last few decades, with minor cyclical interruptions, the supply of safe assets has not kept up with global demand. The reason is straightforward: the collective growth rate of the advanced economies that produce safe assets has been lower than the world's growth rate, which has been driven disproportionately by the high growth rate of high-saving emerging economies such as China. The signature of this growing shortage is a steady increase in the price of safe assets; equivalently, global safe interest rates must decline, as has been the case since the 1980s. The early literature, brought to light by Ben Bernanke's famous "savings glut" speech of 2005, focused on a general shortage of assets without isolating its safe asset component. The distinction, however, has become increasingly important over time, particularly in the aftermath of the subprime mortgage crisis and its sequels. We begin by describing the main facts and macroeconomic implications of safe asset shortages. Faced with such a structural conundrum, what are the likely short- to medium-term escape valves? We analyze four of them, each with its own macroeconomic and financial trade-offs.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 46
页数:18
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BRUEGEL POLICY BRIEF
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, G7 Current Account Imbalances: Sustainability and Adjustment
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, THE ECONOMIST
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, NBER Working Paper 22210
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, 21670 NBER
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 15636 NBER
[7]  
Barclays Capital, 2012, EQ GILT STUD 2012
[8]  
Bernanke B., 2005, FEDERAL RESERVE BOAR
[9]  
Brunnermeier M. K, 2016, REVERSAL INTER UNPUB
[10]  
Brunnermeier Markus K., 2016, 65 EC POL PAN FLOR I