Employer coverage of clinical preventive services in the United States

被引:45
作者
Bondi, MA
Harris, JR [1 ]
Atkins, D
French, ME
Umland, B
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Hlth Promot Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[2] US Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Agcy Healthcare Res & Qual, Ctr Outcomes & Evidence, Rockville, MD USA
[3] Potoman Hlth Consulting LLC, Arlington, VA USA
[4] Mercer Human Resource Consulting, New York, NY USA
关键词
employer health costs; health insurance; prevention research; workplace; format : research; research purpose : descriptive; study design : nonexperimental; outcome measure : behavior; productivity; other financial/economic; setting : workplace; health focus : smoking control; strategy; incentives; policy; target population age : adults; target population circumstances : employee; other key words : employer health costs; prevention; tobacco;
D O I
10.4278/0890-1171-20.3.214
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose. To characterize employers' coverage of clinical preventive services. Design. Mercer Human Resource Consulting Inc. included questions on clinical preventive services as part of its National Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Plans, 2001. Setting. A national sample of employers of a large, medium, and small number of employees, including governments. Subjects. Respondents self-identified as most knowledgeable about the organization's health benefits. Measures. Weighted analyses of responses to eight survey questions on health promotion. Results. The survey was completed by 2180 employers, and the response rate was 21%. More than 90% of employers included increased productivity and decreased health care costs among their most important reasons for coverage of clinical preventive services. Within health insurance, coverage of physical examinations, immunizations, and screenings generally exceeded 50%, but coverage of lifestyle modification services was less than 20%. Only 20% of employers covered tobacco cessation services, and only 4% of employers provided an "optimal" benefit. We compared employers' offerings with a published ranking, by impact and value, of clinical preventive services. We found the biggest discrepancy in tobacco cessation services and alcohol problem prevention, which ranked high in terms of impact and value but are offered by only 20% and 18% of employers, respectively. Conclusions. Employers seek financial return from their offerings of clinical preventive services to employees, but they are least likely to offer the services most likely to provide this return.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 222
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
ABRAMSON JH, 1990, SURVEY MEHTODS COMMU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, GUID CLIN PREV SERV
[3]  
BONDI MA, 2002, PREVENTIVE SERVICES
[4]  
CARDINAL BJ, 2004, AM FITNESS, V22, P40
[5]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1993, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V44, P219
[6]  
Chapman N., 2003, WAS MAN SER, V3
[7]   Priorities among recommended clinical preventive services [J].
Coffield, AB ;
Maciosek, MV ;
McGinnis, JM ;
Harris, JR ;
Caldwell, MB ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Atkins, D ;
Richland, JH ;
Haddix, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 21 (01) :1-9
[8]  
Evans CA, 2001, AM J PREV MED, V20, P10
[9]   The effect of health insurance coverage on the appropriate use of recommended clinical preventive services [J].
Faulkner, LA ;
Schauffler, HH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1997, 13 (06) :453-458
[10]  
Fiore MC, 2000, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V283, P3244