Predatory behaviour of trapping fungi against srf mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans and different plant and animal parasitic nematodes

被引:54
作者
de Gives, PM
Davies, KG
Clark, SJ
Behnke, JM
机构
[1] INIFAP, PAVET, CENID, Morelos 62500, Mexico
[2] IACR Rothamsted, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, Herts, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Sch Biol Sci, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
nematophagous fungi; Caenorhabditis elegans; surface mutants; parasitic nematodes;
D O I
10.1017/S0031182099004424
中图分类号
R38 [医学寄生虫学]; Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ; 100103 ;
摘要
The initial infection process of nematode-trapping fungi is based on an interaction between the trapping structure of the fungus and the surface of the nematode cuticle. A bioassay was designed to investigate the predatory response of several isolates of nematode-trapping fungi against 3 mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans (AT6, AT10 and CL261), which have been reported to differ in the reaction of their cuticle to antibodies and lectins. The bioassay was also applied to infective larvae of animal (Haemonchus contortus, Teladorsagia (Ostertagia) circumcincta and Trichostrongylus axei) and plant (Meloidogyne spp.) parasitic nematodes. Differences in trapping ability were most marked in the first 24 h, and were density dependent. Although the isolate of Arthrobotrys responded very rapidly in the first 24 h, Duddingtonia flagrans was generally the most effective isolate and Monacrosporium responded relatively poorly throughout all experiments. All the fungi tested trapped the srf mutants of C. elegans more efficiently than the wild type, and there were differences between the different srf mutants of C. elegans. Differences in trapping ability were also observed between different isolates of D. flagrans; similarly,differences in trapping behaviour were observed not only amongst the different species of plant-parasitic nematodes, but also between the sheathed and exsheathed larvae of the animal-parasitic nematodes.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 104
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
[2]  
Barron G.L., 1977, Topics in Mycobiology, P1, DOI [10.1002/jobm.19790190412, DOI 10.1002/JOBM.19790190412]
[3]   CARBON DIOXIDE-DEPENDENT MORPHOGENESIS IN ARTHROBOTRYS CONOIDES [J].
BARTNICKIGARCIA, S ;
EREN, J ;
PRAMER, D .
NATURE, 1964, 204 (496) :804-&
[4]   CAPTURE OF PLANT-PARASITIC NEMATODES BY AN ADHESIVE HYPHAE FORMING ISOLATE OF ARTHROBOTRYS-OLIGOSPORA AND SOME OTHER NEMATODE-TRAPPING FUNGI [J].
BELDER, ED ;
JANSEN, E .
NEMATOLOGICA, 1994, 40 (03) :423-437
[5]  
Bird A.F., 1991, STRUCTURE NEMATODES
[6]   INVITRO ACTIVITY OF VARIOUS ANTHELMINTIC COMPOUNDS AGAINST HAEMONCHUS-CONTORTUS LARVAE [J].
BOISVENUE, RJ ;
BRANDT, MC ;
GALLOWAY, RB ;
HENDRIX, JC .
VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 1983, 13 (04) :341-347
[7]   Comparison of the trapping ability of Arthrobotrys robusta and Monacrosporium gephyropagum on infective larvae of Strongyloides papillosus [J].
Cruz, MEG ;
de Gives, PM ;
Romero, HQ .
JOURNAL OF HELMINTHOLOGY, 1998, 72 (03) :209-213
[8]  
Davies E. B., 1992, GEOM FUNCT ANAL, V2, P105, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01895707
[9]   Attachment tests of Pasteuria penetrans to the cuticle of plant and animal parasitic nematodes, free living nematodes and srf mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans [J].
de Gives, PM ;
Davies, KG ;
Morgan, M ;
Behnke, JM .
JOURNAL OF HELMINTHOLOGY, 1999, 73 (01) :67-71
[10]  
DEGIVES PM, 1994, J HELMINTHOL, V68, P223