Automating network meta-analysis

被引:602
作者
van Valkenhoef, Gert [1 ]
Lu, Guobing [1 ]
de Brock, Bert [1 ]
Hillege, Hans [1 ]
Ades, A. E. [1 ]
Welton, Nicky J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1002/jrsm.1054
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Mixed treatment comparison (MTC) (also called network meta-analysis) is an extension of traditional meta-analysis to allow the simultaneous pooling of data from clinical trials comparing more than two treatment options. Typically, MTCs are performed using general-purpose Markov chain Monte Carlo software such as WinBUGS, requiring a model and data to be specified using a specific syntax. It would be preferable if, for the most common cases, both could be derived from a well-structured data file that can be easily checked for errors. Automation is particularly valuable for simulation studies in which the large number of MTCs that have to be estimated may preclude manual model specification and analysis. Moreover, automated model generation raises issues that provide additional insight into the nature of MTC. We present a method for the automated generation of Bayesian homogeneous variance random effects consistency models, including the choice of basic parameters and trial baselines, priors, and starting values for the Markov chain(s). We validate our method against the results of five published MTCs. The method is implemented in freely available open source software. This means that performing an MTC no longer requires manually writing a statistical model. This reduces time and effort, and facilitates error checking of the dataset. Copyright (C) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 299
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations [J].
Brooks, SP ;
Gelman, A .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 1998, 7 (04) :434-455
[2]   Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis [J].
Cipriani, Andrea ;
Furukawa, Toshiaki A. ;
Salanti, Georgia ;
Geddes, John R. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Churchill, Rachel ;
Watanabe, Norio ;
Nakagawa, Atsuo ;
Omori, Ichiro M. ;
McGuire, Hugh ;
Tansella, Michele ;
Barbui, Corrado .
LANCET, 2009, 373 (9665) :746-758
[3]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[4]   Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis [J].
Dias, S. ;
Welton, N. J. ;
Caldwell, D. M. ;
Ades, A. E. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (7-8) :932-944
[5]  
Dias S, 2011, TECHNICAL REPORT
[6]  
Fowler Martin., 2003, UML DISTILLED, V3
[7]  
Gelman A., 1992, Statist. Sci., V7, P457
[8]  
Graves TL, 2008, INTRO YADAS
[9]   ON THE MINIMUM DIAMETER SPANNING TREE PROBLEM [J].
HASSIN, R ;
TAMIR, A .
INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 1995, 53 (02) :109-111
[10]   Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis [J].
Hedges, LV ;
Vevea, JL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1998, 3 (04) :486-504