Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity

被引:519
作者
Stenholm, Pekka [1 ]
Acs, Zoltan J. [2 ,3 ]
Wuebker, Robert [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, TSE Entre, Turku Sch Econ, Turku 20014, Finland
[2] George Mason Univ, Sch Publ Policy, Arlington, VA 22201 USA
[3] Imperial Coll Business Sch, London, England
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Management, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Entrepreneurship indicator; High-impact entrepreneurship; Institutional theory; Multidimensional; STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP; BUSINESS OWNERSHIP; KNOWLEDGE; IMPACT; GROWTH; OPPORTUNITIES; DETERMINANTS; ENVIRONMENTS; LEGITIMACY; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study introduces a novel multidimensional measure of the entrepreneurial environment that reveals how differences in institutional arrangements influence both the rate and the type of entrepreneurial activity in a country. Drawing from institutional theory, the measure examines the regulatory, normative, and cognitive dimensions of entrepreneurial activity, and introduces a novel conducive dimension that measures a country's capability to support high-impact entrepreneurship. Our findings suggest that differences in institutional arrangements are associated with variance in both the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity across countries. For the formation of innovative, high-growth new ventures, the regulative environment matters very little. For high-impact entrepreneurship an institutional environment Red with new opportunities created by knowledge spillovers and the capital necessary for high-impact entrepreneurship matter most. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 193
页数:18
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]  
ACS ZJ, 1988, AM ECON REV, V78, P678
[2]   Entrepreneurship, agglomeration and technological change [J].
Acs, ZJ ;
Varga, A .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2005, 24 (03) :323-334
[3]   Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Desai, Sameeksha ;
Hessels, Jolanda .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2008, 31 (03) :219-234
[4]  
Acs ZJ, 2010, INT HANDB SER ENTREP, P165, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-1191-9_7
[5]   THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION: KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVERS, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, AND ECONOMIC GROWTH [J].
Agarwal, Rajshree ;
Audretsch, David ;
Sarkar, M. B. .
STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOURNAL, 2007, 1 (3-4) :263-286
[6]   Learning from successful local private firms in China: Establishing legitimacy [J].
Ahlstrom, D ;
Bruton, GD .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2001, 15 (04) :72-83
[7]   Institutional barriers to small- and medium-sized enterprise operations in transition countries [J].
Aidis, R .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2005, 25 (04) :305-318
[8]   FOOLS RUSH IN - THE INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT OF INDUSTRY CREATION [J].
ALDRICH, HE ;
FIOL, CM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (04) :645-670
[9]   Heroes, Villains, and Fools: Institutional Entrepreneurship, NOT Institutional Entrepreneurs [J].
Aldrich, Howard E. .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2011, 1 (02)
[10]   DISCOVERY AND CREATION: ALTERNATIVE THEORIES OF ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTION [J].
Alvarez, Sharon A. ;
Barney, Jay B. .
STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOURNAL, 2007, 1 (1-2) :11-26