Regulatory focus and the probability estimates of conjunctive and disjunctive events

被引:58
作者
Brockner, J [1 ]
Paruchuri, S [1 ]
Idson, LC [1 ]
Higgins, ET [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Grad Sch Business, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/obhd.2000.2938
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Prior research has shown that people overestimate the likelihood of conjunctive events and underestimate the likelihood of disjunctive events. We evaluated whether people's regulatory focus success was related to the magnitude of these judgmental biases. Regulatory focus theory posits that people are guided by two distinct motivational systems-promotion focus and prevention focus. When people are promotion focused they attempt to bring their actual selves into alignment with their ideal selves (standards reflecting wishes and aspirations). When people are prevention focused they attempt to bring their actual selves into alignment with their ought selves (standards reflecting duties and obligations). As predicted, promotion success (i.e., congruence between actual and ideal selves) was positively related to the accuracy of disjunctive probability estimates, whereas prevention success (i.e., congruence between actual and ought selves) was not. Also as predicted, greater prevention success led to more accurate conjunctive probability estimates, whereas greater promotion success did not. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 24
页数:20
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   COSTS AND BENEFITS OF JUDGMENT ERRORS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DEBIASING [J].
ARKES, HR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (03) :486-498
[2]   SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITY OF COMPOUND EVENTS [J].
BARHILLEL, M .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1973, 9 (03) :396-406
[3]  
Bazerman M.H., 1998, JUDGMENT MANAGERIAL
[4]  
Bowlby J., 1969, ATTACHMENT LOSS
[5]  
BROCKNER J, IN PRESS ORG BEHAV H
[6]   Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making [J].
Crowe, E ;
Higgins, ET .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1997, 69 (02) :117-132
[7]  
Fazio R.H., 1995, ATTITUDE STRENGTH AN, DOI DOI 10.1521/SOCO.2007.25.5.603
[8]  
FRIEDMAN R, 1999, PHENOMENOLOGICAL COR
[9]  
Higgins E. T., 1989, Advances in experimental social psychology, V22, P93, DOI [10.1016/S0065-2601, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601, 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60306-8, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60306-8]
[10]   Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator [J].
Higgins, ET ;
Shah, J ;
Friedman, R .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 72 (03) :515-525