Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for internal carotid artery disease -: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:127
作者
Debrey, Sarah M. [1 ]
Yu, Hua [1 ]
Lynch, John K. [1 ]
Loevblad, Karl-Olof
Wright, Violet L. [1 ]
Janket, Sok-Ja D.
Baird, Alison E. [1 ]
机构
[1] NINDS, NIH, Stroke Neurosci Unit, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
carotid arteries; carotid artery stenosis; magnetic resonance angiography; angiography; contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography;
D O I
10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.509877
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose - Accurate diagnosis of the degree of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis is needed for decisions regarding optimal stroke prevention. Noninvasive magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is being proposed and used as a replacement for the gold standard, intra-arterial angiography. Our purpose was to perform a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis to determine the sensitivity and specificity of time-of-flight (TOF) MRA and contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA for the detection of (1) high-grade (>= 70% to 99%) ICA stenoses; ( 2) ICA occlusions; ( 3) moderately severe (50% to 69%) ICA stenoses; and ( 4) compare the overall accuracy of the 2 MRA techniques. Methods - The medical literature on MRA and the diagnosis of ICA steno-occlusive disease was reviewed through the PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases. All publication years were included through to November 2006. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they compared the accuracy of TOF or CE MRA for the detection of ICA disease against intra-arterial angiography and reported sufficient data. Results - The overall sensitivity of TOF MRA for the detection of >= 70% to 99% ICA stenoses was 91.2% (95% CI: 88.9% to 93.1%) with a specificity of 88.3% (86.7% to 89.7%), whereas the sensitivity of CE MRA was 94.6% (92.4% to 96.4%) with a specificity of 91.9% (90.3% to 93.4%). For the detection of ICA occlusions, the sensitivity of TOF MRA was 94.5% ( 91.2% to 96.8%) and the specificity was 99.3% (98.9% to 99.6%), whereas the sensitivity and specificity values for CE MRA were 99.4% (96.8% to 100%) and 99.6% (99.2% to 99.9%), respectively. For moderately severe ( 0% to 69%) stenoses, TOF MRA had a sensitivity of only 37.9% (29.3% to 47.1%) and a specificity of 92.1% (89.6% to 94.1%); for CE MRA, the pooled sensitivity value was somewhat better at 65.9% (57.0% to 74.0%), whereas the specificity was 93.5% (91.3% to 95.3%). Conclusions - TOF MRA and CE MRA showed high accuracy for the detection of high- grade ICA stenoses and occlusions with CE MRA having the edge over TOF MRA, but had only poor (TOF MRA) to fair (CE MRA) sensitivity for the detection of moderately severe stenoses.
引用
收藏
页码:2237 / 2248
页数:12
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Alvarez-Linera J, 2003, AM J NEURORADIOL, V24, P1012
[2]   SURGICAL DECISIONS ON THE BASIS OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY OF THE CAROTID ARTERIES [J].
ANSON, JA ;
HEISERMAN, JE ;
ROBERTSON, JT ;
DRAYER, BP ;
SPETZLER, RF ;
SMITH, RR .
NEUROSURGERY, 1993, 32 (03) :335-343
[3]   Carotid artery stenosis: Intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading [J].
Anzalone, N ;
Scomazzoni, F ;
Castellano, R ;
Strada, L ;
Righi, C ;
Politi, LS ;
Kirchin, MA ;
Chiesa, R ;
Scotti, G .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 236 (01) :204-213
[4]   Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy [J].
Back, MR ;
Wilson, JS ;
Rushing, G ;
Stordahl, N ;
Linden, C ;
Johnson, BL ;
Bandyk, DF .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 32 (03) :429-438
[5]   Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis [J].
Barnett, HJM ;
Taylor, W ;
Eliasziw, M ;
Fox, AJ ;
Ferguson, GG ;
Haynes, RB ;
Rankin, RN ;
Clagett, GP ;
Hachinski, VC ;
Sackett, DL ;
Thorpe, KE ;
Meldrum, HE ;
Spence, JD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (20) :1415-1425
[6]   Contrast-enhanced 3-D MRA in decision making for carotid endarterectomy: A 6-year experience [J].
Barth, Alain ;
Arnold, Marcel ;
Mattle, Heinrich P. ;
Schroth, Gerhard ;
Remonda, Luca .
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2006, 21 (5-6) :393-400
[7]   Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography of carotid bifurcation stenosis [J].
Binaghi, S ;
Maeder, P ;
Uské, A ;
Meuwly, JY ;
Devuyst, G ;
Meuli, RA .
EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 2001, 46 (01) :25-34
[8]  
Borisch I, 2003, AM J NEURORADIOL, V24, P1117
[9]   Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 49 (01) :1-6
[10]   High-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using fluoroscopic monitoring of contrast arrival: Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability [J].
Butz, B ;
Dorenbeck, U ;
Borisch, I ;
Zorger, N ;
Lenhart, M ;
Feuerbach, S ;
Link, J .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2004, 45 (02) :164-170