Computerized Visual Feedback: An Adjunct to Robotic-Assisted Gait Training

被引:69
作者
Banz, Raphael
Bolliger, Marc [1 ]
Colombo, Gery [3 ]
Dietz, Volker [2 ,4 ]
Luenenburger, Lars [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Sensory Motor Syst Lab, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Balgrist Univ Hosp, Spinal Cord Injury Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Hocoma AG, Volketswil, Switzerland
[4] Univ Zurich, Dept Paraplegiol, Zurich, Switzerland
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2008年 / 88卷 / 10期
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.2522/ptj.20070203
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose. Robotic devices for walking rehabilitation allow new possibilities for providing performance-related information to patients during gait training. Based on motor learning principles, augmented feedback during robotic-assisted gait training might improve the rehabilitation process used to regain walking function. This report presents a method to provide visual feedback implemented in a driven gait orthosis (I)GO). The purpose of the study was to compare the immediate effect oil motor output in subjects during robotic-assisted gait training when they used Computerized Visual feedback and when they followed verbal instructions of a physical therapist. Subjects. Twelve people with neurological gait disorders clue to incomplete spinal cord injury participated. Methods. Subjects were instructed to walk within the DGO in 2 different conditions. They were asked to increase their motor output by following the instructions of a therapist and by observing visual feedback. In addition, the subjects' opinions about using Visual feedback were investigated by a questionnaire. Results. Computerized visual feedback and verbal instructions by the therapist were observed to result in a similar change in motor output in subjects when walking within the DGO. Subjects reported that they were more motivated and concentrated on their movements when using computerized visual feedback compared with when no form of feedback was provided. Discussion and Conclusion. Computerized visual feedback is a valuable adjunct to robotic-assisted gait training. It represents a relevant tool to increase patients' motor Output, involvement, and motivation during gait training, similar to verbal instructions by it therapist.
引用
收藏
页码:1135 / 1145
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Visual EMG biofeedback to improve ankle function in hemiparetic gait [J].
Aiello, E. ;
Gates, D. H. ;
Patritti, B. L. ;
Cairns, K. D. ;
Meister, M. ;
Clancy, E. A. ;
Bonato, P. .
2005 27TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-7, 2005, :7703-7706
[2]  
American Spinal Injury Association, 2002, International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury
[3]   Effects of computer feedback on adherence to exercise [J].
Annesi, JJ .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1998, 87 (02) :723-730
[4]  
Colombo G, 2000, J REHABIL RES DEV, V37, P693
[5]   Locomotor capacity attributable to step training versus spontaneous recovery after spinalization in adult cats [J].
de Leon, RD ;
Hodgson, JA ;
Roy, RR ;
Edgerton, VR .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 79 (03) :1329-1340
[6]   Weight-supported treadmill vs overground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI [J].
Dobkin, B ;
Apple, D ;
Barbeau, H ;
Basso, M ;
Behrman, A ;
Deforge, D ;
Ditunno, J ;
Dudley, G ;
Elashoff, R ;
Fugate, L ;
Harkema, S ;
Saulino, M ;
Scott, M .
NEUROLOGY, 2006, 66 (04) :484-492
[7]   Effects of biofeedback treatment on gait in children with cerebral palsy [J].
Dursun, E ;
Dursun, N ;
Alican, D .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 26 (02) :116-120
[8]  
Hesse S, 2000, J REHABIL RES DEV, V37, P701
[9]   Robotic-assisted, body-weight supported treadmill training in individuals following motor incomplete spinal cord injury [J].
Hornby, TG ;
Zemon, DH ;
Campbell, D .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2005, 85 (01) :52-66
[10]   Recent developments in biofeedback for neuromotor rehabilitation [J].
Huang, He ;
Wolf, Steven L. ;
He, Jiping .
JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2006, 3 (1)