Double moral hazard, monitoring, and the nature of contracts

We consider the choice of contract between an entrepreneur and a worker: in a situation where the worker cannot readily observe the outcome (such as profit or output) of their joint endeavor, while the entrepreneur cannot easily observe the effort supplied by the worker. We analyze this problem using a generalized double-sided moral-hazard model, with risk-averse parties who mutually monitor each other (to get a reasonable idea of outcome/effort). The model considers trade-off between monitoring costs and moral hazard costs, which are endogenously determined by the extent of monitoring. Using this model, we formally prove a generalized version of Coase's conjecture - that the optimal contract minimizes the agency and risk costs. We then show how varying assumptions about the feasibility or cost of monitoring of the outcome or the worker's effort lead to different contracts being optimal. The analysis is then used to explain the nature of contracts observed in practice under many different situations. We will give an explanation as to why industrial workers typically work under wage contracts, while share contracts are common in agriculture and will explain why profit sharing is more common for senior managers than for the production workers.