State policies in private law? A comment on Hanoch Dagan

被引:7
作者
Teubner, Gunther [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Frankfurt Main, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] London Sch Econ, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.5131/ajcl.2007.0029
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The comment focuses on the question how the public/private divide influences the legitimacy of private law's references to state policies and public values. The thesis is to separate the public/private divide from the distinction between state and society as well as from the distinction between public law and private law. The traditional private/public duality is dissolved into a plurality of social segments. The "public" then reappears within each social system-now in a different sense-as that system's expression of its intrinsic normativity, which private law legitimately takes into account.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 843
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, RECONCEIVING REALITY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, THEORETICAL INQUIRIE, V8, P51
[3]  
Bauman Z., 1993, POSTMODERN ETHICS
[4]   The limited autonomy of private law [J].
Dagan, Hanoch .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW, 2008, 56 (03) :809-833
[5]  
DORF MC, 2003, CONSTITUTION DEMOCRA
[6]  
FRIEDLAND R, 1992, SYMBOLS PRACTICES I
[7]  
Habermas J., 1996, FACTS NORMS CONTRIBU
[8]  
HABERMAS J, 1996, FACTS NORMS, pCH8
[9]  
Habermas J., 1989, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere
[10]  
HART OD, 2006, CONTRACTS REFERENCE